Cited by 112Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlSpeech and Audio Processing

In-Ear Audio Wearable: Measurement of Heart and Breathing Rates for Health and Safety Monitoring

Martin, Alexis, Voix, Jeremie·2018·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper examines the integration of a noninvasive vital sign monitoring feature into the workers' hearing protection devices (HPDs) by using a microphone positioned within the earcanal under the HPD. METHODS: 25 test-subjects were asked to breathe at various rhythms and intensities and these realistic sound events were recorded in the earcanal. Digital signal processing algorithms were then developed to assess heart and breathing rates. Finally, to test the robustness of theses algorithms in noisy work environments, industrial noise was added to the in-ear recorded signals and an adaptive denoising filter was used. RESULTS: The developed algorithms show an absolute mean error of 4.3 beats per minute (BPM) and 2.7 cycles per minute (CPM). The mean difference estimate is -0.44 BPM with a limit of agreement (LoA) interval of -14.3 to 13.4 BPM and 2.40 CPM with a LoA interval of -2.62 to 7.48 CPM. Excellent denoising is achieved with the adaptive filter, able to cope with ambient sound pressure levels of up to 110 dB SPL, resulting in a small error for heart rate detection, but a much larger error for breathing rate detection. CONCLUSION: Extraction of the heart and breathing rates from an acoustical measurement in the occluded earcanal under an HPD is possible and can even be conducted in the presence of a high level of ambient noise. SIGNIFICANCE: This proof of concept enables the development of a wide range of noninvasive health and safety monitoring audio wearables for industrial workplaces and life-critical applications where HPDs are used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2017.2720463

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 112

Authors
Martin, A., & Voix, J.
Affiliations
École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2018-06
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1256-1263
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2724757864
Cited by
112
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • EERS Technologies, Inc.
  • NSERC-EERS Industrial Research Chair in In-Ear Technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
hearing protection devices, heart rate monitoring, breathing rate monitoring, ear canal acoustics, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, adaptive denoising, industrial noise, health and safety monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Ear, Equipment Design, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult, Respiratory Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review