Hearables: Automatic Overnight Sleep Monitoring With Standardized In-Ear EEG Sensor
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Advances in sensor miniaturization and computational power have served as enabling technologies for monitoring human physiological conditions in real-world scenarios. Sleep disruption may impact neural function, and can be a symptom of both physical and mental disorders. This study proposes wearable in-ear electroencephalography (ear-EEG) for overnight sleep monitoring as a 24/7 continuous and unobtrusive technology for sleep quality assessment in the community. METHODS: A total of 22 healthy participants took part in overnight sleep monitoring with simultaneous ear-EEG and conventional full polysomnography recordings. The ear-EEG data were analyzed in the both structural complexity and spectral domains. The extracted features were used for automatic sleep stage prediction through supervized machine learning, whereby the PSG data were manually scored by a sleep clinician. RESULTS: The agreement between automatic sleep stage prediction based on ear-EEG from a single in-ear sensor and the hypnogram based on the full PSG was 74.1% in the accuracy over five sleep stage classification. This is supported by a substantial agreement in the kappa metric (0.61). CONCLUSION: The in-ear sensor is feasible for monitoring overnight sleep outside the sleep laboratory and also mitigates technical difficulties associated with PSG. It, therefore, represents a 24/7 continuously wearable alternative to conventional cumbersome and expensive sleep monitoring. SIGNIFICANCE: The "standardized" one-size-fits-all viscoelastic in-ear sensor is a next generation solution to monitor sleep-this technology promises to be a viable method for readily wearable sleep monitoring in the community, a key to affordable healthcare and future eHealth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automatic sleep stage prediction based on a single in-ear sensor demonstrated a 74% agreement with the hypnogram generated from full PSG.
“A 2019 study showed that automatic sleep stage prediction based on a single in-ear sensor demonstrated a 74% agreement with the hypnogram generated from full PSG, which is promising but still requires further work for it to be at a clinical standard of performance (90% agreement)63.”
From The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine (2020) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Nakamura, T., Alqurashi, Y. D., Morrell, M. J., & Mandic, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 203-212
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2941894772
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Rosetrees Trust
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (EP/P008461)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- ear-EEG, polysomnography comparison, wearable sleep monitoring, sleep quality assessment, e-health
- MeSH terms
- Wearable Electronic Devices, Adult, Ear, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sleep Stages, Polysomnography, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review