The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Static Scheduling of Synchronous Data Flow Programs for Digital Signal Processing
Abstract
Large grain data flow (LGDF) programming is natural and convenient for describing digital signal processing (DSP) systems, but its runtime overhead is costly in real time or cost-sensitive applications. In some situations, designers are not willing to squander computing resources for the sake of programmer convenience. This is particularly true when the target machine is a programmable DSP chip. However, the runtime overhead inherent in most LGDF implementations is not required for most signal processing systems because such systems are mostly synchronous (in the DSP sense). Synchronous data flow (SDF) differs from traditional data flow in that the amount of data produced and consumed by a data flow node is specified a priori for each input and output. This is equivalent to specifying the relative sample rates in signal processing system. This means that the scheduling of SDF nodes need not be done at runtime, but can be done at compile time (statically), so the runtime overhead evaporates. The sample rates can all be different, which is not true of most current data-driven digital signal processing programming methodologies. Synchronous data flow is closely related to computation graphs, a special case of Petri nets. This self-contained paper develops the theory necessary to statically schedule SDF programs on single or multiple processors. A class of static (compile time) scheduling algorithms is proven valid, and specific algorithms are given for scheduling SDF systems onto single or multiple processors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in dataflow programming languages
Johnston, W. M., Hanna, J. R. P., & Millar, R. J. (2004) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1013208.1013209 · Cited by 503
Big data: From beginning to future
Yaqoob, I., Hashem, I. A. T., Gani, A., Mokhtar, S., Ahmed, E., Anuar, N. B., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.009 · Cited by 410
NeuFlow: A runtime reconfigurable dataflow processor for vision
Farabet, C., Martini, B., Corda, B., Akselrod, P., Culurciello, E., & LeCun, Y. (2011) · CVPR 2011 WORKSHOPS · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2011.5981829 · Cited by 369
An order-aware dataflow model for parallel Unix pipelines
Handa, S., Kallas, K., Vasilakis, N., & Rinard, M. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3473570 · Cited by 4
“In contrast to standard dataflow models [Kahn 1974; Kahn and MacQueen 1977; Karp and Miller 1966; Lee and Messerschmitt 1987a,b], our dataflow model is order-aware — i.e. , the order in which a node in the dataflow graph consumes inputs from different edges plays a central role in the semantics of…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, E. A., & Messerschmitt, D. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computers
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- C-36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-35
- ISSN
- 0018-9340 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120431055
- Cited by
- 1,318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Static Scheduling of Synchronous Data Flow Programs for Digital Signal Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tc.1987.5009446
- The paper
- Lee, E. A., & Messerschmitt, D. G. (1987). Static Scheduling of Synchronous Data Flow Programs for Digital Signal Processing. IEEE Transactions on Computers. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.1987.5009446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.