Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 562

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Angel-Eye: A Complete Design Flow for Mapping CNN Onto Embedded FPGA

Guo, Kaiyuan, Sui, Lingzhi, Qiu, Jiantao, Yu, Jincheng, Wang, Junbin, Yao, Song, Han, Song, Wang, Yu, Yang, Huazhong·2018·IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems

Abstract

Convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a successful algorithm in the region of artificial intelligence and a strong candidate for many computer vision algorithms. But the computation complexity of CNN is much higher than traditional algorithms. With the help of GPU acceleration, CNN-based applications are widely deployed in servers. However, for embedded platforms, CNN-based solutions are still too complex to be applied. Various dedicated hardware designs on field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) have been carried out to accelerate CNNs, while few of them explore the whole design flow for both fast deployment and high power efficiency. In this paper, we investigate state-of-the-art CNN models and CNN-based applications. Requirements on memory, computation and the flexibility of the system are summarized for mapping CNN on embedded FPGAs. Based on these requirements, we propose Angel-Eye, a programmable and flexible CNN accelerator architecture, together with data quantization strategy and compilation tool. Data quantization strategy helps reduce the bit-width down to 8-bit with negligible accuracy loss. The compilation tool maps a certain CNN model efficiently onto hardware. Evaluated on Zynq XC7Z045 platform, Angel-Eye is 6× faster and 5× better in power efficiency than peer FPGA implementation on the same platform. Applications of VGG network, pedestrian detection and face alignment are used to evaluate our design on Zynq XC7Z020. NIVIDA TK1 and TX1 platforms are used for comparison. Angel-Eye achieves similar performance and delivers up to 16× better energy efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcad.2017.2705069

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 562

Metadata

Authors
Guo, K., Sui, L., Qiu, J., Yu, J., Wang, J., Yao, S., Han, S., Wang, Y., & Yang, H.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Published
2018-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
35-47
ISSN
  • 0278-0070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-4151
OpenAlex
W2616014673
Cited by
562
References
8
FWCI
53.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Angel-Eye: A Complete Design Flow for Mapping CNN Onto Embedded FPGA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcad.2017.2705069
The paper
Guo, K., Sui, L., Qiu, J., Yu, J., Wang, J., Yao, S., Han, S., Wang, Y., & Yang, H. (2018). Angel-Eye: A Complete Design Flow for Mapping CNN Onto Embedded FPGA. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcad.2017.2705069

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.