VSTherm: A Virtual Path-Based Stochastic Solver for Full-Chip Leakage-Aware Nonlinear Thermal Simulation
Abstract
The continuous advancement of semiconductor processes has led to increasingly prominent leakage power issues in integrated circuits (ICs), making leakage-aware nonlinear thermal simulation a critical challenge in modern chip design. Traditional deterministic field solvers provide high accuracy but suffer from significant computational inefficiencies when handling large-scale mesh structures. Conversely, stochastic methods offer rapid computation speeds but are inherently limited to single-point solutions, preventing them from effectively addressing nonlinear thermal problems. To address this challenge, we propose a virtual path-based stochastic solver that enables efficient leakage-aware thermal simulation. The virtual path algorithm decomposes each real path in Brownian motion into virtual paths, extending stochastic solvers from single-point solutions to regional solutions, allowing a stochastic method to achieve full-chip thermal simulation for the first time, thus enabling the handling of nonlinearity. Additionally, we further accelerate the iteration process by reusing the path trajectories from the first solution process. Extensive experimental evaluations demonstrate that our method achieves a speedup of 20.17× to 52.23× compared to the state-of-the-art solver 3D-ICE on 4 GPUs across various scenarios while maintaining comparable accuracy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25
- Authors
- Meng, Y., Dong, Z., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Bi, Z., Zhu, K., Wang, S.-G., Zhou, D., & Zeng, X.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
- Published
- 2026-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4464-4477
- ISSN
- 0278-0070 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4151
- OpenAlex
- W7123357368
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Research Projects (92473207)
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Project (24JD1400800)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
- Keywords
- leakage power, stochastic solvers, Brownian motion, path decomposition, thermal nonlinearity, integrated circuit thermal management, GPU acceleration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review