The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate Cancer Classification Using Expressions of Very Few Genes
Abstract
We aim at finding the smallest set of genes that can ensure highly accurate classification of cancers from microarray data by using supervised machine learning algorithms. The significance of finding the minimum gene subsets is three-fold: 1) It greatly reduces the computational burden and "noise" arising from irrelevant genes. In the examples studied in this paper, finding the minimum gene subsets even allows for extraction of simple diagnostic rules which lead to accurate diagnosis without the need for any classifiers. 2) It simplifies gene expression tests to include only a very small number of genes rather than thousands of genes, which can bring down the cost for cancer testing significantly. 3) It calls for further investigation into the possible biological relationship between these small numbers of genes and cancer development and treatment. Our simple yet very effective method involves two steps. In the first step, we choose some important genes using a feature importance ranking scheme. In the second step, we test the classification capability of all simple combinations of those important genes by using a good classifier. For three "small" and "simple" data sets with two, three, and four cancer (sub)types, our approach obtained very high accuracy with only two or three genes. For a "large" and "complex" data set with 14 cancer types, we divided the whole problem into a group of binary classification problems and applied the 2-step approach to each of these binary classification problems. Through this "divide-and-conquer" approach, we obtained accuracy comparable to previously reported results but with only 28 genes rather than 16,063 genes. In general, our method can significantly reduce the number of genes required for highly reliable diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Khan, J., Wei, J. S., Ringnér, M., Saal, L. H., Ladanyi, M., Westermann, F., Berthold, F., Schwab, M., Antonescu, C. R., Peterson, C., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/89044 · Cited by 2,644
Cited by
Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 · Cited by 6,143
Kumagai, S., Togashi, Y., Kamada, T., Sugiyama, E., Nishinakamura, H., Takeuchi, Y., Vitaly, K., Itahashi, K., Maeda, Y., Matsui, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-020-0769-3 · Cited by 783
Feature selection methods for big data bioinformatics: A survey from the search perspective
Wang, L., Wang, Y., & Chang, Q. (2016) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.08.014 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Chu, F., & Xie, W.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-53
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090091537
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate Cancer Classification Using Expressions of Very Few Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcbb.2007.1006
- The paper
- Wang, L., Chu, F., & Xie, W. (2007). Accurate Cancer Classification Using Expressions of Very Few Genes. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcbb.2007.1006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.