Integrative data analysis of multi-platform cancer data with a multimodal deep learning approach
Abstract
Identification of cancer subtypes plays an important role in revealing useful insights into disease pathogenesis and advancing personalized therapy. The recent development of high-throughput sequencing technologies has enabled the rapid collection of multi-platform genomic data (e.g., gene expression, miRNA expression, and DNA methylation) for the same set of tumor samples. Although numerous integrative clustering approaches have been developed to analyze cancer data, few of them are particularly designed to exploit both deep intrinsic statistical properties of each input modality and complex cross-modality correlations among multi-platform input data. In this paper, we propose a new machine learning model, called multimodal deep belief network (DBN), to cluster cancer patients from multi-platform observation data. In our integrative clustering framework, relationships among inherent features of each single modality are first encoded into multiple layers of hidden variables, and then a joint latent model is employed to fuse common features derived from multiple input modalities. A practical learning algorithm, called contrastive divergence (CD), is applied to infer the parameters of our multimodal DBN model in an unsupervised manner. Tests on two available cancer datasets show that our integrative data analysis approach can effectively extract a unified representation of latent features to capture both intra- and cross-modality correlations, and identify meaningful disease subtypes from multi-platform cancer data. In addition, our approach can identify key genes and miRNAs that may play distinct roles in the pathogenesis of different cancer subtypes. Among those key miRNAs, we found that the expression level of miR-29a is highly correlated with survival time in ovarian cancer patients. These results indicate that our multimodal DBN based data analysis approach may have practical applications in cancer pathogenesis studies and provide useful guidelines for personalized cancer therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DBNs have been extensively used to fuse biomedical modalities for drug repurposing, clustering of cancer patients, and predicting disease-gene pairs.
“DBNs have been extensively used to fuse biomedical modalities for drug repurposing [52], clustering of cancer patients [53] and predicting disease-gene pairs [54].”
From Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 231
- Authors
- Liang, M., Li, Z., Chen, T., & Zeng, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 928-937
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001502878
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Basic Research Program of China (2011CBA00300, 2011CBA00301)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61033001, 61361136003, 61472205)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- tumor subtypes, integrative clustering, gene expression, microRNA expression, DNA methylation, contrastive divergence, miR-29a, ovarian cancer survival, precision oncology
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Humans, Neoplasms, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review