Cited by 284MicroRNA in disease regulationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Inferring microrna-disease associations by random walk on a heterogeneous network with multiple data sources

Liu, Yuansheng, Zeng, Xiangxiang, He, Zengyou, Zou, Quan·2017·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Since the discovery of the regulatory function of microRNA (miRNA), increased attention has focused on identifying the relationship between miRNA and disease. It has been suggested that computational method are an efficient way to identify potential disease-related miRNAs for further confirmation using biological experiments. In this paper, we first highlighted three limitations commonly associated with previous computational methods. To resolve these limitations, we established disease similarity subnetwork and miRNA similarity subnetwork by integrating multiple data sources, where the disease similarity is composed of disease semantic similarity and disease functional similarity, and the miRNA similarity is calculated using the miRNA-target gene and miRNA-lncRNA (long non-coding RNA) associations. Then, a heterogeneous network was constructed by connecting the disease similarity subnetwork and the miRNA similarity subnetwork using the known miRNA-disease associations. We extended random walk with restart to predict miRNA-disease associations in the heterogeneous network. The leave-one-out cross-validation achieved an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0:8049 across 341 diseases and 476 miRNAs. For five-fold cross-validation, our method achieved an AUC from 0:7970 to 0:9249 for 15 human diseases. Case studies further demonstrated the feasibility of our method to discover potential miRNA-disease associations. An online service for prediction is freely available at http://ifmda.aliapp.com.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbb.2016.2550432

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several researches proved that coding genes, noncoding RNAs, and proteins are related to diseases, including AD.

    “Several researches proved that coding genes/noncoding RNAs/proteins were related to diseases, including AD [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 284

Authors
Liu, Y., Zeng, X., He, Z., & Zou, Q.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2017-07-01
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
905-915
ISSN
1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313125707
Cited by
284
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 20
FWCI
23.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (61370010, 61572094, 61202011)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2014J01253)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
microRNA-disease association prediction, heterogeneous networks, random walk with restart, disease similarity, long non-coding RNA, disease semantic similarity, multi-source data fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review