The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast Prediction of Protein Methylation Sites Using a Sequence-Based Feature Selection Technique
Abstract
Protein methylation, an important post-translational modification, plays crucial roles in many cellular processes. The accurate prediction of protein methylation sites is fundamentally important for revealing the molecular mechanisms undergoing methylation. In recent years, computational prediction based on machine learning algorithms has emerged as a powerful and robust approach for identifying methylation sites, and much progress has been made in predictive performance improvement. However, the predictive performance of existing methods is not satisfactory in terms of overall accuracy. Motivated by this, we propose a novel random-forest-based predictor called MePred-RF, integrating several discriminative sequence-based feature descriptors and improving feature representation capability using a powerful feature selection technique. Importantly, unlike other methods based on multiple, complex information inputs, our proposed MePred-RF is based on sequence information alone. Comparative studies on benchmark datasets via vigorous jackknife tests indicate that our proposed MePred-RF method remarkably outperforms other state-of-the-art predictors, leading by a 4.5 percent average in terms of overall accuracy. A user-friendly webserver that implements the proposed method has been established for researchers' convenience, and is now freely available for public use through http://server.malab.cn/MePred-RF. We anticipate our research tool to be useful for the large-scale prediction and analysis of protein methylation sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Sirtuins in aging and age-related disease
Longo, V. D., & Kennedy, B. K. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.002 · Cited by 628
Using subsite coupling to predict signal peptides
Chou, K.-C. (2001) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/14.2.75 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Post-translational modifications in proteins: resources, tools and prediction methods
Ramazi, S., & Zahiri, J. (2021) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baab012 · Cited by 772
Zou, Q., Xing, P., Wei, L., & Liu, B. (2019) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.069112.118 · Cited by 525
Self-citationPrediction and analysis of essential genes using the enrichments of gene ontology and KEGG pathways
Chen, L., Zhang, Y.-H., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Huang, T., & Cai, Y.-D. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184129 · Cited by 466
Bhadra, P., Yan, J., Li, J., Fong, S., & Siu, S. W. I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19752-w · Cited by 339
Wei, L., Xing, P., Zeng, J., Chen, J., Su, R., & Guo, F. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.03.001 · Cited by 242
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, L., Xing, P., Shi, G., Ji, Z., & Zou, Q.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1264-1273
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9964
- 2374-0043
- OpenAlex
- W2588614855
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Prediction of Protein Methylation Sites Using a Sequence-Based Feature Selection Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcbb.2017.2670558
- The paper
- Wei, L., Xing, P., Shi, G., Ji, Z., & Zou, Q. (2019). Fast Prediction of Protein Methylation Sites Using a Sequence-Based Feature Selection Technique. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcbb.2017.2670558
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.