A multimodal deep neural network for human breast cancer prognosis prediction by integrating multi-dimensional data
Abstract
Breast cancer is a highly aggressive type of cancer with very low median survival. Accurate prognosis prediction of breast cancer can spare a significant number of patients from receiving unnecessary adjuvant systemic treatment and its related expensive medical costs. Previous work relies mostly on selected gene expression data to create a predictive model. The emergence of deep learning methods and multi-dimensional data offers opportunities for more comprehensive analysis of the molecular characteristics of breast cancer and therefore can improve diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. In this study, we propose a Multimodal Deep Neural Network by integrating Multi-dimensional Data (MDNNMD) for the prognosis prediction of breast cancer. The novelty of the method lies in the design of our method's architecture and the fusion of multi-dimensional data. The comprehensive performance evaluation results show that the proposed method achieves a better performance than the prediction methods with single-dimensional data and other existing approaches. The source code implemented by TensorFlow 1.0 deep learning library can be downloaded from the Github: https://github.com/USTC-HIlab/MDNNMD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liu et al. [86] and Sun et al. [87] learned the weights of the predictions by their sub-models as hyperparameters on a validation set.
“Liu et al. [86] and Sun et al. [87] learned the weights of the predictions by their sub-models as hyperparameters on a validation set.”
From Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [87]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 338
- Authors
- Sun, D., Wang, M., & Li, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2019-05-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 841-850
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9964
- 2374-0043
- OpenAlex
- W2791015340
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61471331, 61571414, 31100955)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- breast cancer, outcome prediction, multimodal deep neural networks, gene expression data, molecular properties, survival prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Prognosis, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review