Cited by 338Gene expression and cancer classificationBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesAI in cancer detection

A multimodal deep neural network for human breast cancer prognosis prediction by integrating multi-dimensional data

Sun, Dongdong, Wang, Minghui, Li, Ao·2019·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Breast cancer is a highly aggressive type of cancer with very low median survival. Accurate prognosis prediction of breast cancer can spare a significant number of patients from receiving unnecessary adjuvant systemic treatment and its related expensive medical costs. Previous work relies mostly on selected gene expression data to create a predictive model. The emergence of deep learning methods and multi-dimensional data offers opportunities for more comprehensive analysis of the molecular characteristics of breast cancer and therefore can improve diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. In this study, we propose a Multimodal Deep Neural Network by integrating Multi-dimensional Data (MDNNMD) for the prognosis prediction of breast cancer. The novelty of the method lies in the design of our method's architecture and the fusion of multi-dimensional data. The comprehensive performance evaluation results show that the proposed method achieves a better performance than the prediction methods with single-dimensional data and other existing approaches. The source code implemented by TensorFlow 1.0 deep learning library can be downloaded from the Github: https://github.com/USTC-HIlab/MDNNMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbb.2018.2806438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liu et al. [86] and Sun et al. [87] learned the weights of the predictions by their sub-models as hyperparameters on a validation set.

    “Liu et al. [86] and Sun et al. [87] learned the weights of the predictions by their sub-models as hyperparameters on a validation set.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 338

Authors
Sun, D., Wang, M., & Li, A.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
841-850
ISSN
  • 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9964
  • 2374-0043
OpenAlex
W2791015340
Cited by
338
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61471331, 61571414, 31100955)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
breast cancer, outcome prediction, multimodal deep neural networks, gene expression data, molecular properties, survival prediction
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Prognosis, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review