PhenoBERT: A Combined Deep Learning Method for Automated Recognition of Human Phenotype Ontology
Abstract
Automated recognition of Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms from clinical texts is of significant interest to the field of clinical data mining. In this study, we develop a combined deep learning method named PhenoBERT for this purpose. PhenoBERT uses BERT, currently the state-of-the-art NLP model, as its core model for evaluating whether a clinically relevant text segment (CTS) could be represented by an HPO term. However, to avoid unnecessary comparison of a CTS with each of ∼14,000 HPO terms using BERT, we introduce a two-levels CNN module consisting of a series of CNN models organized at two levels in PhenoBERT. For a given CTS, the CNN module produces only a short list of candidate HPO terms for BERT to evaluate, significantly improving the computational efficiency. In addition, BERT is able to assign an ancestor HPO term to a CTS when recognition of the direct HPO term is not successful, mimicking the process of HPO term assignment by human. In two benchmarks, PhenoBERT outperforms four traditional dictionary-based methods and two recently developed deep learning-based methods in two benchmark tests, and its advantage is more obvious when the recognition task is more challenging. As such, PhenoBERT is of great use for assisting in the mining of clinical text data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PhenoBERT demonstrated strong performance in identifying phenotype mentions across diverse clinical narratives while maintaining computational efficiency.
“PhenoBERT demonstrated strong performance in identifying phenotype mentions across diverse clinical narratives while maintaining computational efficiency23.”
From TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
PhenoBERT is a state-of-the-art transformer-based model designed for phenotype extraction and normalization to HPO.
“For this task, we adopted PhenoBERT23, a state-of-the-art transformer-based model designed for phenotype extraction and normalization to HPO35.”
From TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Conventional NLP approaches for temporal information extraction suffer from limited scalability and generalizability and struggle to interpret implicit or vague temporal expressions.
“Conventional natural language processing (NLP) approaches suffer from limited scalability and generalizability, and struggle to interpret implicit or vague temporal expressions.”
From TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Expansion of the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) knowledge base and resources
Köhler, S., Carmody, L., Vasilevsky, N., Jacobsen, J. O. B., Danis, D., Gourdine, J.-P., Gargano, M., Harris, N. L., Matentzoglu, N., McMurry, J. A., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1105 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Biomedical and clinical English model packages for the Stanza Python NLP library
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Qi, P., Manning, C. D., & Langlotz, C. P. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab090 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RareBench: Can LLMs Serve as Rare Diseases Specialists?
Chen, X., Mao, X., Guo, Q., Wang, L., Zhang, S., & Chen, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671576 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives
Chen, F., Jiang, S., Nguyen, Q. M., Ta, C. N., Wang, K., Chung, W. K., & Weng, C. (2026) · npj Health Systems · doi:10.1038/s44401-026-00099-8
- Authors
- Feng, Y., Qi, L., & Tian, W.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Shandong University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2023-03-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1269-1277
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9964
- 2374-0043
- OpenAlex
- W4224997359
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2301500)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170667, 31871325)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- Human Phenotype Ontology, clinical text mining, BERT, convolutional neural networks, computational efficiency, medical data mining
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Family, Humans, Phenotype, Benchmarking, Data Mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review