Cited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

Revealing Free Energy Landscape From MD Data via Conditional Angle Partition Tree

Open access
Jiang, Hangjin, Li, Han, Wong, Wing Hung, Fan, Xiaodan·2023·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Deciphering the free energy landscape of biomolecular structure space is crucial for understanding many complex molecular processes, such as protein-protein interaction, RNA folding, and protein folding. A major source of current dynamic structure data is Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. Several methods have been proposed to investigate the free energy landscape from MD data, but all of them rely on the assumption that kinetic similarity is associated with global geometric similarity, which may lead to unsatisfactory results. In this paper, we proposed a new method called Conditional Angle Partition Tree to reveal the hierarchical free energy landscape by correlating local geometric similarity with kinetic similarity. Its application on the benchmark alanine dipeptide MD data showed a much better performance than existing methods in exploring and understanding the free energy landscape. We also applied it to the MD data of Villin HP35. Our results are more reasonable on various aspects than those from other methods and very informative on the hierarchical structure of its energy landscape.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbb.2022.3172352

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jiang, H., Li, H., Wong, W. H., & Fan, X.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Fan, Xiaodan
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
1384-1394
ISSN
  • 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9964
  • 2374-0043
OpenAlex
W4225416386
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMS-1811920)
  • Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR (400913, 14203915, 14173817)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11901517, 61972355)
  • Key R&D Program of Zhejiang (2021C03G2013079)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
free energy landscape, molecular dynamics data, geometric similarity, hierarchy, alanine dipeptide, protein folding, RNA folding, protein-protein interaction
MeSH terms
Dipeptides, Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Trees, Protein Folding, Benchmarking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review