Federated Learning Empowered Real-Time Medical Data Processing Method for Smart Healthcare
Abstract
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has always been an important research topic for applying artificial intelligence in smart healthcare. Sufficient medical data are one of the most critical factors in CAD research. However, medical data are usually obtained in chronological order and cannot be collected all at once, which poses difficulties for the application of deep learning technology in the medical field. The traditional batch learning method consumes considerable time and space resources for real-time medical data, and the incremental learning method often leads to catastrophic forgetting. To solve these problems, we propose a real-time medical data processing method based on federated learning. We divide the process into the model stage and the exemplar stage. In the model stage, we use the federated learning method to fuse the old and new models to mitigate the catastrophic forgetting problem of the new model. In the exemplar stage, we use the most representative exemplars selected from the old data to help the new model review the old knowledge, which further mitigates the catastrophic forgetting problem of the new model. We use this method to conduct experiments on a simulated medical real-time data stream. The experimental results show that our method can learn a disease diagnosis model from a continuous medical real-time data stream. As the amount of data increases, the performance of the disease diagnosis model continues to improve, and the catastrophic forgetting problem has been effectively mitigated. Compared with the traditional batch learning method, our method can significantly save time and space resources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The review could not retrieve some papers ([94] and [95]) due to subscription download policies, limiting the range of the survey.
“However, still we failed to reach some of them ( [94] and [95]) which is limiting the range of this survey.”
From A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [94]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Guo, K., Chen, T., Ren, S., Li, N., Hu, M., & Kang, J.
- Affiliations
- Central South University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2024-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 869-879
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9964
- 2374-0043
- OpenAlex
- W4283361841
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62076255)
- Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province (2020SK2059)
- National Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2019JJ20025, 2019JJ40406, 2022JJ30424)
- National Social Science Fund of China (20&ZD120)
- Open Research Projects of Zhejiang Lab (2022RC0AB07)
- Key projects of Hunan Education Department (20A88)
- Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Depart-ment of Education (21B0616)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- federated learning, catastrophic forgetting, continuous data streams, computer-aided diagnosis, incremental learning, model fusion, disease diagnosis, smart healthcare
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Databases, Factual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review