Escaping the Drug-Bias Trap: Using Debiasing Design to Improve Interpretability and Generalization of Drug-Target Interaction Prediction
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Considering the high cost associated with determining reaction affinities through in vitro experiments, virtual screening of potential drugs bound to specific protein pockets from vast compounds is critical in AI-assisted drug discovery. Deep-learning approaches have been proposed for predicting Drug-Target Interactions (DTIs). However, they have shown an overestimated accuracy due to the drug-bias trap, a challenge where traditional multimodal models overly rely on the drug branch while underutilizing protein information. This raises doubts about the interpretability and generalizability of existing DTI models. Therefore, we introduce UdanDTI, an innovative deep-learning architecture explicitly designed for predicting drug-protein interactions. UdanDTI applies an unbalanced dual-branch system and an attentive aggregation module to enhance interpretability from a biological perspective. Across various public datasets, UdanDTI demonstrates outstanding performance, outperforming state-of-the-art models under in-domain, cross-domain, and structural interpretability settings. Notably, it demonstrates exceptional accuracy in predicting drug responses of two crucial subgroups of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations associated with non-small cell lung cancer, consistent with experimental results. Meanwhile, UdanDTI could complement the advanced molecular docking software DiffDock.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Synthon-based ligand discovery in virtual libraries of over 11 billion compounds
Sadybekov, A. A., Sadybekov, A. V., Liu, Y., Iliopoulos-Tsoutsouvas, C., Huang, X.-P., Pickett, J., Houser, B., Patel, N., Tran, N. K., Tong, F., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04220-9 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Drug–target interaction predication via multi-channel graph neural networks
Li, Y., Qiao, G., Wang, K., & Wang, G. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab346 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
DeepCPI: A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Large-Scale <i>in Silico</i> Drug Screening
Wan, F., Zhu, Y., Hu, H., Dai, A., Cai, X., Chen, L., Gong, H., Xia, T., Yang, D., Wang, M.-W., et al. (2019) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.04.003 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhang, P., Ma, J., & Chen, T.
- Affiliations
- Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ma, Jianzhu
- Chen, Ting
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2025-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1902-1911
- ISSN
- 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
- 2998-4165
- OpenAlex
- W4411019816
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFF1207100, 2024YFF1207103, 2022YFC2703100, 2022YFC2703105)
- Guoqiang Institute, Tsinghua University
- Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Keywords
- drug-target interaction prediction, interpretability, generalization, dual-branch architecture, virtual screening, EGFR mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, drug response prediction, DiffDock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review