Cited by 13Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Escaping the Drug-Bias Trap: Using Debiasing Design to Improve Interpretability and Generalization of Drug-Target Interaction Prediction

Open access
Zhang, Peidong, Ma, Jianzhu, Chen, Ting·2025·IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Considering the high cost associated with determining reaction affinities through in vitro experiments, virtual screening of potential drugs bound to specific protein pockets from vast compounds is critical in AI-assisted drug discovery. Deep-learning approaches have been proposed for predicting Drug-Target Interactions (DTIs). However, they have shown an overestimated accuracy due to the drug-bias trap, a challenge where traditional multimodal models overly rely on the drug branch while underutilizing protein information. This raises doubts about the interpretability and generalizability of existing DTI models. Therefore, we introduce UdanDTI, an innovative deep-learning architecture explicitly designed for predicting drug-protein interactions. UdanDTI applies an unbalanced dual-branch system and an attentive aggregation module to enhance interpretability from a biological perspective. Across various public datasets, UdanDTI demonstrates outstanding performance, outperforming state-of-the-art models under in-domain, cross-domain, and structural interpretability settings. Notably, it demonstrates exceptional accuracy in predicting drug responses of two crucial subgroups of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations associated with non-small cell lung cancer, consistent with experimental results. Meanwhile, UdanDTI could complement the advanced molecular docking software DiffDock.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbbio.2025.3576488

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, P., Ma, J., & Chen, T.
Affiliations
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ma, Jianzhu
  • Chen, Ting
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
1902-1911
ISSN
  • 1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
  • 2998-4165
OpenAlex
W4411019816
Cited by
13
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFF1207100, 2024YFF1207103, 2022YFC2703100, 2022YFC2703105)
  • Guoqiang Institute, Tsinghua University
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
drug-target interaction prediction, interpretability, generalization, dual-branch architecture, virtual screening, EGFR mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, drug response prediction, DiffDock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review