The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Joint Scheduling and Cloud Offloading for Mobile Applications
Abstract
Cloud offloading is an indispensable solution to supporting computationally demanding applications on resource constrained mobile devices. In this paper, we introduce the concept of wireless aware joint scheduling and computation offloading (JSCO) for multi-component applications, where an optimal decision is made on which components need to be offloaded as well as the scheduling order of these components. The JSCO approach allows for more degrees of freedom in the solution by moving away from a compiler pre-determined scheduling order for the components towards a more wireless aware scheduling order. For some component dependency graph structures, the proposed algorithm can shorten execution times by parallel processing appropriate components in the mobile and cloud. We define a net utility that trades-off the energy saved by the mobile, subject to constraints on the communication delay, overall application execution time, and component precedence ordering. The linear optimization problem is solved using real data measurements obtained from running multi-component applications on an HTC smartphone and the Amazon EC2, using WiFi for cloud offloading. The performance is further analyzed using various component dependency graph topologies and sizes. Results show that the energy saved increases with longer application runtime deadline, higher wireless rates, and smaller offload data sizes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The vision of autonomic computing
Kephart, J. O., & Chess, D. M. (2003) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2003.1160055 · Cited by 6,572
The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing
Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., & Davies, N. (2009) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2009.82 · Cited by 3,660
MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload
Cuervo, E., Balasubramanian, A., Cho, D.-K., Wolman, A., Saroiu, S., Chandra, R., & Bahl, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/1814433.1814441 · Cited by 2,281
(2011) · doi:10.1145/1966445.1966473 · Cited by 1,870
Cited by
A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective
Mao, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., Huang, K., & Letaief, K. B. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2745201 · Cited by 5,607
Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey on Architecture and Computation Offloading
Mach, P., & Becvar, Z. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2682318 · Cited by 3,258
Communication-Efficient Federated Learning for Digital Twin Edge Networks in Industrial IoT
Lu, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, K., Maharjan, S., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3010798 · Cited by 316
Goudarzi, M., Palaniswami, M., & Buyya, R. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2021.3123165 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahmoodi, S. E., Uma, R. N., & Subbalakshmi, K. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-313
- ISSN
- 2168-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-0018
- OpenAlex
- W2344695221
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Joint Scheduling and Cloud Offloading for Mobile Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcc.2016.2560808
- The paper
- Mahmoodi, S. E., Uma, R. N., & Subbalakshmi, K. P. (2019). Optimal Joint Scheduling and Cloud Offloading for Mobile Applications. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcc.2016.2560808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.