Directed Search: A New Operator in NSGA-II for Task Scheduling in IoT Based on Cloud-Fog Computing
Abstract
In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) developments have made it one of the most important technologies. The exponential growth of data and increasing the number of latency-sensitive applications has necessitated a new approach to support these applications. The emerging fog computing architecture has partially addressed the issue of latency and other limitations of the IoT-based cloud computing paradigm. In order to achieve high-quality services and high system performance, an appropriate and efficient task scheduling method is needed, in addition, the energy consumption of computing devices should be considered. In this article, a constraint bi-objective optimization problem is designed to minimize the servers’ energy consumption and overall response time simultaneously. Then, to solve this problem, by introducing a recombination operator and modifying NSGA-II, a directed non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, called D-NSGA-II is proposed. This algorithm can control the selection pressure of agents, and balance the exploration and exploitation abilities of the algorithm using this new operator. To evaluate the performance of this algorithm, it is compared with well-known meta-heuristic algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate the D-NSGA-II has better performance than other algorithms. It can also respond to all requests before their deadline.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An evolution to Edge Computing would be enabled by emerging technologies such as SDN, NFV, and ICN.
“Such an evolution to Edge Computing would be enabled by currently emerging technologies such as Software Defined Networking (SDN), Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) and Information-Centric Networking (ICN) [186].”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [186]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, R., & Gill, S. S. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.02.004 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mousavi, S., Mood, S. E., Souri, A., & Javidi, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (IR)
- Yazd University (IR)
- Haliç University (TR)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
- Published
- 2023-04-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2144-2157
- ISSN
- 2168-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-0018
- OpenAlex
- W4285259090
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
- Keywords
- task scheduling, Internet of Things, fog computing, cloud-fog computing, NSGA-II, crossover operator, multi-objective optimization, energy consumption, response time, deadline constraints, selection pressure, exploration-exploitation balance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review