Cited by 51IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCloud Computing and Resource ManagementScheduling and Optimization Algorithms

Directed Search: A New Operator in NSGA-II for Task Scheduling in IoT Based on Cloud-Fog Computing

Mousavi, Soghra, Mood, Sepehr Ebrahimi, Souri, Alireza, Javidi, Mohammad Masoud·2023·IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing

Abstract

In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) developments have made it one of the most important technologies. The exponential growth of data and increasing the number of latency-sensitive applications has necessitated a new approach to support these applications. The emerging fog computing architecture has partially addressed the issue of latency and other limitations of the IoT-based cloud computing paradigm. In order to achieve high-quality services and high system performance, an appropriate and efficient task scheduling method is needed, in addition, the energy consumption of computing devices should be considered. In this article, a constraint bi-objective optimization problem is designed to minimize the servers’ energy consumption and overall response time simultaneously. Then, to solve this problem, by introducing a recombination operator and modifying NSGA-II, a directed non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, called D-NSGA-II is proposed. This algorithm can control the selection pressure of agents, and balance the exploration and exploitation abilities of the algorithm using this new operator. To evaluate the performance of this algorithm, it is compared with well-known meta-heuristic algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate the D-NSGA-II has better performance than other algorithms. It can also respond to all requests before their deadline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcc.2022.3188926

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An evolution to Edge Computing would be enabled by emerging technologies such as SDN, NFV, and ICN.

    “Such an evolution to Edge Computing would be enabled by currently emerging technologies such as Software Defined Networking (SDN), Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) and Information-Centric Networking (ICN) [186].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [186]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mousavi, S., Mood, S. E., Souri, A., & Javidi, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (IR)
  • Yazd University (IR)
  • Haliç University (TR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
Published
2023-04-01
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
2144-2157
ISSN
  • 2168-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-0018
OpenAlex
W4285259090
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Keywords
task scheduling, Internet of Things, fog computing, cloud-fog computing, NSGA-II, crossover operator, multi-objective optimization, energy consumption, response time, deadline constraints, selection pressure, exploration-exploitation balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review