Cited by 141Emotion and Mood RecognitionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFace and Expression Recognition

EEG-Based Emotion Recognition Using Hierarchical Network With Subnetwork Nodes

Yang, Yimin, Wu, Q. M. Jonathan, Zheng, Wei-Long, Lu, Bao-Liang·2018·IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems

Abstract

Emotions play a crucial role in decision-making, brain activity, human cognition, and social intercourse. This paper proposes a hierarchical network structure with subnetwork nodes to discriminate three human emotions: 1) positive; 2) neutral; and 3) negative. Each subnetwork node embedded in the network that are formed by hundreds of hidden nodes, could be functional as an independent hidden layer for feature representation. The top layer of the hierarchical network, like the mammal cortex in the brain, combine such features generated from subnetwork nodes, but simultaneously, recast these features into a mapping space so that the network can be performed to produce more reliable cognition. The proposed method is compared with other state-of-the-art methods. The experimental results from two different EEG datasets show that a promising result is obtained when using the proposed method with both single and multiple modality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcds.2017.2685338

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On the SEED dataset, the Bimodal-LSTM model's accuracy was about 2 percentage points higher than the state-of-the-art approaches.

    “which is about 2% points higher than the state-of-the-art approaches”

    From Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using Deep Neural Networks (2017) · cites this paper as [14]

  • On the SEED dataset, the Bimodal-LSTM model achieved the best accuracy of 93.97% among the compared models.

    “Bimodal-LSTM achieves the best accuracy (93.97%)”

    From Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using Deep Neural Networks (2017) · cites this paper as [14]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 141

Authors
Yang, Y., Wu, Q. M. J., Zheng, W.-L., & Lu, B.-L.
Affiliations
  • University of Windsor (CA)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
Published
2018-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
408-419
ISSN
  • 2379-8920 (ISSN-L)
  • 2379-8939
OpenAlex
W2598673810
Cited by
141
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Canada Research Chairs Program
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61272248, 61673266)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB329401)
  • Major Basic Research Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (15JC1400103)
  • Technology Research and Development Program of China Railway Corporation (2016Z003-B)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
EEG-based emotion recognition, hierarchical neural networks, emotion classification, feature representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review