Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Weaknesses and improvements of an efficient password based remote user authentication scheme using smart cards

Wei-Chi Ku, Shuai-Min Chen·2004·IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics

Abstract

Recently, Chien et al. proposed an efficient remote authentication scheme using smart cards. However, we find that their scheme is vulnerable to a reflection attack and an insider attack. In addition, their scheme lacks reparability. Herein, we first show the weaknesses of Chien et al.'s scheme, and then propose an improved scheme with better security strength.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tce.2004.1277863

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Ku, W.-C., & Chen, S.-M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
Published
2004-02
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
204-207
ISSN
0098-3063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149336128
Cited by
268
References
1
FWCI
16.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weaknesses and improvements of an efficient password based remote user authentication scheme using smart cards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tce.2004.1277863
The paper
Ku, W.-C., & Chen, S.-M. (2004). Weaknesses and improvements of an efficient password based remote user authentication scheme using smart cards. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2004.1277863

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.