The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilevel Features Convolutional Neural Network for Multifocus Image Fusion
Abstract
Multifocus image fusion is an important technique that aims to generate a single clean image by fusing multiple input images. In this paper, we propose a novel multilevel features convolutional neural network (MLFCNN) architecture for image fusion. In the MLFCNN model, all features learned from previous layers are passed to the subsequent layer. Inside every path between the previous layer and the subsequent layer, we add a 1 × 1 convolution module to reduce the redundancy. In our method, the source images first are fed to our pre-trained MLFCNN model to obtain the initial focus map. Then, the initial focus map is performed by morphological opening and closing operations and followed by a Gaussian filter to obtain the final decision map. Finally, the fused all-in-focus image is generated based on a weighted-sum strategy with the decision map. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms some state-of-the-art image fusion algorithms in terms of both qualitative and objective evaluations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The data fusion in the anchor layers combines the data for further processing in the next layers [23].”
From Automated placental abruption identification using semantic segmentation, quantitative features, SVM, ensemble and multi-path CNN (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Objective image fusion performance measure
Xydeas, C. S., & Petrović, V. (2000) · Electronics Letters · doi:10.1049/el:20000267 · Cited by 2,011
Image Fusion With Guided Filtering
Shutao Li, A., Kang, X., & Hu, J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2013.2244222 · Cited by 1,789
Multisensor Image Fusion Using the Wavelet Transform
Li, H., Manjunath, B. S., & Mitra, S. (1995) · Graphical Models and Image Processing · doi:10.1006/gmip.1995.1022 · Cited by 1,576
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Image fusion meets deep learning: A survey and perspective
Zhang, H., Xu, H., Tian, X. S., Jiang, J., & Ma, J. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.06.008 · Cited by 844
Multi-focus image fusion: A Survey of the state of the art
Liu, Y., Wang, L., Cheng, J., Li, C., & Chen, X. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.013 · Cited by 326
Classification Saliency-Based Rule for Visible and Infrared Image Fusion
Xu, H., Zhang, H., & Ma, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2021.3100986 · Cited by 297
Medical image fusion method by deep learning
Li, Y., Zhao, J., Lv, Z., & Li, J. (2021) · International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ijcce.2020.12.004 · Cited by 280
Current advances and future perspectives of image fusion: A comprehensive review
Karim, S., Tong, G., Li, J., Qadir, A., Farooq, U., & Yu, Y. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.019 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., Nie, Z., Huang, S., Lin, P., & Wu, J.
- Affiliations
- Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- South Central Minzu University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 262-273
- ISSN
- 2333-9403 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0118
- 2573-0436
- OpenAlex
- W2906859782
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61662026, 61862030, 61462031)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20182BCB22006, 20181BAB202010)
- Education Department of Jiangxi Province (KJLD14031, GJJ170312, GJJ170318)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Keywords
- multi-focus image fusion, morphological opening and closing, Gaussian filtering, decision map, weighted sum fusion, all-in-focus image
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review