Cited by 29Artificial Intelligence in GamesAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningNarrative Theory and Analysis

Proactive Mediation in Plan-Based Narrative Environments

Harris, J., Young, R.M.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games

Abstract

In interactive plan-based narrative environments, users' actions must be monitored to ensure that conditions necessary for the execution of narrative plans are not compromised. In the Zocalo system, management of user actions has been performed on a reactionary basis by a process called mediation. In this paper, we describe an extension to this approach,proactive mediation, which calculates responses to user input in an anticipatory manner. A proactive mediation module accepts as input a plan describing the actions being performed by the user (generated by a plan recognition system) and identifies portions of that plan that jeopardize the causal structure of the overall narrative. Once these portions are identified, proactive mediation generates modifications to the narrative plan structure that avoid the unwanted interaction between user and story. This extension to the original mediation algorithm provides more responses to a user's actions and generates responses that are tailored to the user's activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tciaig.2009.2035610

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An experience manager that anticipates the player can avoid intervention by guaranteeing that every player action remains possible.

    “By anticipating the player, the system can avoid intervention by ensuring that every player action can always be accommodated.”

    From Multiagent Narrative Experience Management as Story Graph Pruning (2023) · cites this paper as Harris and Young 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, J., & Young, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Red Hat (United States) (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games
Published
2009-09
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
233-244
ISSN
  • 1943-068X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-0698
OpenAlex
W3023529013
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
Keywords
interactive storytelling, Zócalo, plan recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review