The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attack-Resilient State Estimation for Noisy Dynamical Systems
Abstract
Several recent incidents have clearly illustrated the susceptibility of cyberphysical systems (CPS) to attacks, raising attention to security challenges in these systems. The tight interaction between information technology and the physical world has introduced new vulnerabilities that cannot be addressed with the use of standard cryptographic security techniques. Accordingly, the problem of state estimation in the presence of sensor and actuator attacks has attracted significant attention in the past. Unlike the existing work, in this paper, we consider the problem of attackresilient state estimation in the presence of bounded-size noise. We focus on the most general model for sensor attacks where any signal can be injected via compromised sensors. Specifically, we present an I0-based state estimator that can be formulated as a mixed-integer linear program and its convex relaxation based on the I1norm. For both attack-resilient state estimators, we derive rigorous analytic bounds on the state-estimation errors caused by the presence of noise. Our analysis shows that the worst-case error is linear with the size of the noise and, thus, the attacker cannot exploit the noise to introduce unbounded state-estimation errors. Finally, we show how the I0and I1-based attack-resilient state estimators can be used for sound attack detection and identification; we provide conditions on the size of attack vectors that ensure correct identification of compromised sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systems and control perspective of CPS security
Dibaji, S. M., Pirani, M., Flamholz, D. B., Annaswamy, A. M., Johansson, K. H., & Chakrabortty, A. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.04.011 · Cited by 559
Distributed Krein space-based attack detection over sensor networks under deception attacks
Ge, X., Han, Q.-L., Zhong, M., & Zhang, X.-M. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108557 · Cited by 341
State of the art of cyber-physical systems security: An automatic control perspective
Zacchia Lun, Y., D’Innocenzo, A., Smarra, F., Malavolta, I., & Di Benedetto, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.006 · Cited by 211
Joint attack detection and secure state estimation of cyber‐physical systems
Forti, N., Battistelli, G., Chisci, L., & Sinopoli, B. (2020) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.4724 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Pajic, M., Lee, I., & Pappas, G. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-92
- ISSN
- 2325-5870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2516521254
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attack-Resilient State Estimation for Noisy Dynamical Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcns.2016.2607420
- The paper
- Pajic, M., Lee, I., & Pappas, G. J. (2017). Attack-Resilient State Estimation for Noisy Dynamical Systems. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcns.2016.2607420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.