The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DoS Attack Energy Management Against Remote State Estimation
Abstract
This paper considers a remote state estimation problem, where a sensor measures the state of a linear discrete-time process and has computational capability to implement a local Kalman filter based on its own measurements. The sensor sends its local estimates to a remote estimator over a communication channel that is exposed to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacker. The DoS attacker, subject to limited energy budget, intentionally jams the communication channel by emitting interference noises with the purpose of deteriorating estimation performance. In order to maximize attack effect, following the existing answer to “when to attack the communication channel”, in this paper we manage to solve the problem of “how much power the attacker should use to jam the channel in each time”. For the static attack energy allocation problem, when the system matrix is normal, we derive a sufficient condition for when the maximum number of jamming operations should be used. The associated jamming power is explicitly provided. For a general system case, we propose an attack power allocation algorithm and show the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm is not worse than O(T ), where T is the length of the time horizon considered. When the attack can receive the real-time ACK information, we formulate a dynamic attack energy allocation problem, and transform it to a Markov Decision Process to find the optimal solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming
Hazeghi, K., & Puterman, M. L. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291177 · Cited by 8,037
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139020411 · Cited by 4,642
Cited by
Distributed Krein space-based attack detection over sensor networks under deception attacks
Ge, X., Han, Q.-L., Zhong, M., & Zhang, X.-M. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108557 · Cited by 341
Ahmad, K., Maabreh, M., Ghaly, M., Khan, K., Qadir, J., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2022) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100452 · Cited by 291
State of the art of cyber-physical systems security: An automatic control perspective
Zacchia Lun, Y., D’Innocenzo, A., Smarra, F., Malavolta, I., & Di Benedetto, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.006 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Qi, Y., Wu, J., Fu, L., & He, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 383-394
- ISSN
- 2325-5870 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2533
- OpenAlex
- W2525975698
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DoS Attack Energy Management Against Remote State Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcns.2016.2614099
- The paper
- Zhang, H., Qi, Y., Wu, J., Fu, L., & He, L. (2018). DoS Attack Energy Management Against Remote State Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcns.2016.2614099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.