The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dual methods for nonconvex spectrum optimization of multicarrier systems
Abstract
The design and optimization of multicarrier communications systems often involve a maximization of the total throughput subject to system resource constraints. The optimization problem is numerically difficult to solve when the problem does not have a convexity structure. This paper makes progress toward solving optimization problems of this type by showing that under a certain condition called the time-sharing condition, the duality gap of the optimization problem is always zero, regardless of the convexity of the objective function. Further, we show that the time-sharing condition is satisfied for practical multiuser spectrum optimization problems in multicarrier systems in the limit as the number of carriers goes to infinity. This result leads to efficient numerical algorithms that solve the nonconvex problem in the dual domain. We show that the recently proposed optimal spectrum balancing algorithm for digital subscriber lines can be interpreted as a dual algorithm. This new interpretation gives rise to more efficient dual update methods. It also suggests ways in which the dual objective may be evaluated approximately, further improving the numerical efficiency of the algorithm. We propose a low-complexity iterative spectrum balancing algorithm based on these ideas, and show that the new algorithm achieves near-optimal performance in many practical situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Cited by
Exploiting Multi-Antennas for Opportunistic Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks
Zhang, R., & Liang, Y.-C. (2008) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2007.914894 · Cited by 834
UAV-Enabled Wireless Power Transfer: Trajectory Design and Energy Optimization
Xu, J., Zeng, Y., & Zhang, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2018.2838134 · Cited by 600
Wireless Information and Power Transfer: A Dynamic Power Splitting Approach
Liu, L., Zhang, R., & Chua, K.-C. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2013.071813.130105 · Cited by 579
An introduction to convex optimization for communications and signal processing
Luo, Z.-Q., & Yu, W. (2006) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2006.879347 · Cited by 562
Self-citationConvex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications
(2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804458 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, W., & Lui, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Communications
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1310-1322
- ISSN
- 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0857
- OpenAlex
- W2161272050
- Cited by
- 1,572
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 65.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.