The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the limits of communication with low-precision analog-to-digital conversion at the receiver
Abstract
As communication systems scale up in speed and bandwidth, the cost and power consumption of high-precision (e.g., 8-12 bits) analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) becomes the limiting factor in modern transceiver architectures based on digital signal processing. In this work, we explore the impact of lowering the precision of the ADC on the performance of the communication link. Specifically, we evaluate the communication limits imposed by low-precision ADC (e.g., 1-3 bits) for transmission over the real discrete-time additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, under an average power constraint on the input. For an ADC with K quantization bins (i.e., a precision of log2K bits), we show that the input distribution need not have any more than K+1 mass points to achieve the channel capacity. For 2-bin (1-bit) symmetric quantization, this result is tightened to show that binary antipodal signaling is optimum for any signal-to- noise ratio (SNR). For multi-bit quantization, a dual formulation of the channel capacity problem is used to obtain tight upper bounds on the capacity. The cutting-plane algorithm is employed to compute the capacity numerically, and the results obtained are used to make the following encouraging observations : (a) up to a moderately high SNR of 20 dB, 2-3 bit quantization results in only 10-20% reduction of spectral efficiency compared to unquantized observations, (b) standard equiprobable pulse amplitude modulated input with quantizer thresholds set to implement maximum likelihood hard decisions is asymptotically optimum at high SNR, and works well at low to moderate SNRs as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 36,808
(2007) · Electronics: A First Course · doi:10.4324/9780080477527-64 · Cited by 24,923
Optimization by Vector Space Methods
(1970) · Students Quarterly Journal · doi:10.1049/sqj.1970.0088 · Cited by 6,004
Information Theory and Reliable Communication.
Lee, P. M., & Gallager, R. T. (1970) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344305 · Cited by 5,399
Information Theory and Reliable Communication
Bell, D. A. (1969) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1969.0319 · Cited by 4,012
Information Theory: Coding Theorems for Discrete Memoryless Systems
Csiszár, I., & Körner, J. (2014) · REAL-EOD (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Information Center Oriental Collection) · Cited by 3,246
Analog-to-digital converter survey and analysis
Walden, R. H. (1999) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/49.761034 · Cited by 2,186
Elements of Information Theory
Phoenix, S. J. D. (1992) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349214551641 · Cited by 1,380
Elements of Information Theory, Wiley Series in Telecommunications
Cover, T. M., & Allen, T. (1991) · Cited by 623
Cited by
A Tutorial on Environment-Aware Communications via Channel Knowledge Map for 6G
Zeng, Y., Chen, J., Xu, J., Wu, D., Xu, X., Jin, S., Gao, X., Gesbert, D., Cui, S., & Zhang, R. (2024) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2024.3364508 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, J., Dabeer, O., & Madhow, U.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Communications
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3629-3639
- ISSN
- 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098725264
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the limits of communication with low-precision analog-to-digital conversion at the receiver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcomm.2009.12.080559
- The paper
- Singh, J., Dabeer, O., & Madhow, U. (2009). On the limits of communication with low-precision analog-to-digital conversion at the receiver. IEEE Transactions on Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2009.12.080559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.