The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance Comparison of MIMO Techniques for Optical Wireless Communications in Indoor Environments
Abstract
In this paper, we compare the performance of multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) techniques applied to indoor optical wireless communications (OWC) assuming line-ofsight (LOS) channel conditions. Specifically, several 4 × 4 setups with different transmitter spacings and different positions of the receiver array are considered. The following MIMO algorithms are considered: Repetition Coding (RC), Spatial Multiplexing (SMP) and Spatial Modulation (SM). Particularly, we develop a framework to analytically approximate the bit error ratios (BERs) of these schemes and verify the theoretical bounds by simulations. The results show that due to diversity gains, RC is robust to various transmitter-receiver alignments. However, as RC does not provide spatial multiplexing gains, it requires large signal constellation sizes to enable high spectral efficiencies. In contrast, SMP enables high data rates by exploiting multiplexing gains. In order to provide these gains, SMP needs sufficiently low channel correlation. SM is a combined MIMO and digital modulation technique. We show that SM is more robust to high channel correlation compared to SMP, while enabling larger spectral efficiency compared to RC. Moreover, we investigate the effect of induced power imbalance between the multiple transmitters. It is found that power imbalance can substantially improve the performance of both SMP and SM as it reduces channel correlation. In this context, we also show that blocking some of the links is an acceptable method to reduce channel correlation. Even though the blocking diminishes the received energy, it outweighs this degradation by providing improved channel conditions for SMP and SM. For example, blocking 4 of the 16 links of the 4 × 4 setup improves the BER performance of SMP by more than 20 dB, while the effective signal to noise ratio (SNR) is reduced by about 2 dB due to the blocking. Therefore, MIMO techniques can provide gains even under LOS conditions which provide only little channel differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in terahertz communications accelerated by photonics
Nagatsuma, T., Ducournau, G., & Renaud, C. C. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.65 · Cited by 1,990
A guide to wireless networking by light
Haas, H., Chen, C., & O'Brien, D. (2017) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2017.06.003 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fath, T., & Haas, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Communications
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 733-742
- ISSN
- 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966393174
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Comparison of MIMO Techniques for Optical Wireless Communications in Indoor Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcomm.2012.120512.110578
- The paper
- Fath, T., & Haas, H. (2013). Performance Comparison of MIMO Techniques for Optical Wireless Communications in Indoor Environments. IEEE Transactions on Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2012.120512.110578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.