The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical-Layer Security with Multiuser Scheduling in Cognitive Radio Networks
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we consider a cognitive radio network that consists of one cognitive base station (CBS) and multiple cognitive users (CUs) in the presence of multiple eavesdroppers, where CUs transmit their data packets to CBS under a primary user's quality of service (QoS) constraint while the eavesdroppers attempt to intercept the cognitive transmissions from CUs to CBS. We investigate the physical-layer security against eavesdropping attacks in the cognitive radio network and propose the user scheduling scheme to achieve multiuser diversity for improving the security level of cognitive transmissions with a primary QoS constraint. Specifically, a cognitive user (CU) that satisfies the primary QoS requirement and maximizes the achievable secrecy rate of cognitive transmissions is scheduled to transmit its data packet. For the comparison purpose, we also examine the traditional multiuser scheduling and the artificial noise schemes. We analyze the achievable secrecy rate and intercept probability of the traditional and proposed multiuser scheduling schemes as well as the artificial noise scheme in Rayleigh fading environments. Numerical results show that given a primary QoS constraint, the proposed multiuser scheduling scheme generally outperforms the traditional multiuser scheduling and the artificial noise schemes in terms of the achievable secrecy rate and intercept probability. In addition, we derive the diversity order of the proposed multiuser scheduling scheme through an asymptotic intercept probability analysis and prove that the full diversity is obtained by using the proposed multiuser scheduling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems
Shannon, C. E. (1949) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb00928.x · Cited by 9,440 · cited 1×
“This work was pioneered by Shannon in [11] and further extended by Wyner in [12], where a so-called secrecy capacity is developed from an information-theoretical prospective and shown as the difference between the capacity of the channel from source to destination (referred to as main link) and that of the channel fro…”
Background
Cited by
Securing UAV Communications via Joint Trajectory and Power Control
Zhang, G., Wu, Q., Cui, M., & Zhang, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2019.2892461 · Cited by 615
A Survey on Multiple-Antenna Techniques for Physical Layer Security
Chen, X., Ng, D. W. K., Gerstacker, W. H., & Chen, H.-H. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2633387 · Cited by 474
Physical Layer Network Security in the Full-Duplex Relay System
Chen, G., Gong, Y., Xiao, P., & Chambers, J. A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2015.2390136 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, Y., Wang, X., & Shen, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Communications
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5103-5113
- ISSN
- 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055044375
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical-Layer Security with Multiuser Scheduling in Cognitive Radio Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcomm.2013.111213.130235
- The paper
- Zou, Y., Wang, X., & Shen, W. (2013). Physical-Layer Security with Multiuser Scheduling in Cognitive Radio Networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2013.111213.130235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.