Cited by 111Millimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques

A Novel 3-D Massive MIMO Channel Model for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Environments

Jiang, Hao, Zhang, Zaichen, Dang, Jian, Wu, Liang·2018·IEEE Transactions on Communications

Abstract

This paper presents 3-D vehicle massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna array model for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication environments. A spherical wavefront is assumed in the proposed model instead of the plane wavefront assumption used in the conventional MIMO channel model. Using the proposed V2V channel model, we first derive the closed-form expressions for the joint and marginal probability density functions of the angle of departure at the transmitter and angle of arrival at the receiver in the azimuth and elevation planes. We additionally analyze the time and frequency cross-correlation functions for different propagation paths. In the proposed model, we derive the expression of the Doppler spectrum due to the relative motion between the mobile transmitter and mobile receiver. The results show that the proposed 3-D channel model is in close agreement with previously reported results, thereby validating the generalization of the proposed model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcomm.2017.2751555

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Jiang, H., Zhang, Z., Dang, J., & Wu, L.
Affiliations
Southeast University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Published
2018-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
79-90
ISSN
0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2755117762
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 10
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Communications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • national key research and development plan (2016YFB0502202)
  • NSFC projects (61571105, 61501109, 61601119)
  • Jiangsu NSF project (BK20140646)
  • scientific research foundation of graduate school of Southeast University (YBJJ1655)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Keywords
vehicle-to-vehicle communication, massive MIMO, spherical wavefront, angle of departure, angle of arrival, joint probability density function, cross correlation function, Doppler spectrum, relative motion, antenna arrays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review