Cited by 89Caching and Content DeliveryIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAge of Information Optimization

Online Content Popularity Prediction and Learning in Wireless Edge Caching

Open access
Garg, Navneet, Sellathurai, Mathini, Bhatia, Vimal, Bharath, B. N., Ratnarajah, Tharmalingam·2020·IEEE Transactions on Communications

Abstract

Caching popular contents in advance is an important technique to achieve low latency and reduce the backhaul costs in future wireless communications. Considering a network with base stations distributed as a Poisson point process, optimal content placement caching probabilities are obtained to maximize the average success probability (ASP) for a known content popularity (CP) profile, which in practice is time-varying and unknown in advance. In this paper, we first propose two online prediction (OP) methods for forecasting CP viz., popularity prediction model (PPM) and Grassmannian prediction model (GPM), where the unconstrained coefficients for linear prediction are obtained by solving constrained non-negative least squares. To reduce the higher computational complexity per online round, two online learning (OL) approaches viz., weighted-follow-the-leader and weighted-follow-the-regularized-leader are proposed, inspired by the OP models. In OP, ASP difference (i.e, the gap between the ASP achieved by prediction and that by known content popularity) is bounded, while in OL, sub-linear MSE regret and linear ASP regret bounds are obtained. With MovieLens dataset, simulations verify that OP methods are better for MSE and ASP difference minimization, while the OL approaches perform well for the minimization of the MSE and ASP regrets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcomm.2019.2956041

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simulations from MovieLens datasets [72] show a significant improvement in high cache hit rate over traditional FL-based caching algorithms for the FLchain edge content caching scheme of [71].

    “Simulations from MovieLens datasets [72] show a significant improvement in terms of high cache hit rate over the traditional FL-based caching algorithms.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garg, N., Sellathurai, M., Bhatia, V., Bharath, B. N., & Ratnarajah, T.
Affiliations
  • Heriot-Watt University (GB)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Dharwad (IN)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Communications
Published
2020-02
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
1087-1100
ISSN
  • 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0857
OpenAlex
W2990530686
Cited by
89
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P009549/1, EP/P009670/1)
  • UK-India Education and Research Initiative (DST UKIERI-2016-17-0060, DST/INT/UK/P-129/2016, UGCUKIERI 2016-17-058)
  • Heriot-Watt University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
Keywords
wireless edge caching, content popularity prediction, online learning, content placement, Poisson point process, non-negative least squares, regret bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review