Online Content Popularity Prediction and Learning in Wireless Edge Caching
Open accessAbstract
Caching popular contents in advance is an important technique to achieve low latency and reduce the backhaul costs in future wireless communications. Considering a network with base stations distributed as a Poisson point process, optimal content placement caching probabilities are obtained to maximize the average success probability (ASP) for a known content popularity (CP) profile, which in practice is time-varying and unknown in advance. In this paper, we first propose two online prediction (OP) methods for forecasting CP viz., popularity prediction model (PPM) and Grassmannian prediction model (GPM), where the unconstrained coefficients for linear prediction are obtained by solving constrained non-negative least squares. To reduce the higher computational complexity per online round, two online learning (OL) approaches viz., weighted-follow-the-leader and weighted-follow-the-regularized-leader are proposed, inspired by the OP models. In OP, ASP difference (i.e, the gap between the ASP achieved by prediction and that by known content popularity) is bounded, while in OL, sub-linear MSE regret and linear ASP regret bounds are obtained. With MovieLens dataset, simulations verify that OP methods are better for MSE and ASP difference minimization, while the OL approaches perform well for the minimization of the MSE and ASP regrets.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simulations from MovieLens datasets [72] show a significant improvement in high cache hit rate over traditional FL-based caching algorithms for the FLchain edge content caching scheme of [71].
“Simulations from MovieLens datasets [72] show a significant improvement in terms of high cache hit rate over the traditional FL-based caching algorithms.”
From Federated learning meets blockchain in edge computing: Opportunities and challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103 · see citing works
Optimal and Scalable Caching for 5G Using Reinforcement Learning of Space-Time Popularities
Sadeghi, A., Sheikholeslami, F., & Giannakis, G. B. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2017.2787979 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated learning meets blockchain in edge computing: Opportunities and challenges
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pham, Q.-V., Pathirana, P. N., Le, L. B., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., Niyato, D., & Poor, H. V. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3072611 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garg, N., Sellathurai, M., Bhatia, V., Bharath, B. N., & Ratnarajah, T.
- Affiliations
- Heriot-Watt University (GB)
- Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Dharwad (IN)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Communications
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1087-1100
- ISSN
- 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0857
- OpenAlex
- W2990530686
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P009549/1, EP/P009670/1)
- UK-India Education and Research Initiative (DST UKIERI-2016-17-0060, DST/INT/UK/P-129/2016, UGCUKIERI 2016-17-058)
- Heriot-Watt University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
- Keywords
- wireless edge caching, content popularity prediction, online learning, content placement, Poisson point process, non-negative least squares, regret bounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review