Recent Advances and Trends in Advanced Packaging
Abstract
In this study, advanced packaging is defined. The kinds of advanced packaging are ranked based on their interconnect density and electrical performance, and are grouped into 2-D, 2.1-D, 2.3-D, 2.5-D, and 3-D IC integration, which will be presented and discussed. Chiplet design and heterogeneous integration packaging provide alternatives to the system on chips (especially for advanced nodes) will be discussed. Different substrates, such as size, pin-count, and metal linewidth and spacing for advanced packaging, are examined. The lateral communication between chiplets, such as the silicon bridges embedded in organic build-up package substrate and fan-out epoxy molding compound, as well as flexible bridges, will be presented. Fan-in packaging, such as the six-side molded wafer-level chip-scale package (WLCSP) and its comparison with the ordinary WLCSP, are presented. Fan-out packaging, such as the chip-first with die face-up, chip-first with die face-down, and chip-last and their difference, will be provided. Low-loss dielectric materials for high-speed and high-frequency applications in advanced packaging will be presented. Flip-chip assembly by mass reflow, thermocompression bonding, and bumpless hybrid bonding will be briefly mentioned first.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advanced packaging techniques such as TSV, TSV-less interposers, and heterogeneous integration are used to improve signal integrity, power and thermal distribution, and die yield by breaking complex and large SoCs into smaller chiplets.
“More advanced packaging techniques (see Fig. 4) such as through-silicon via (TSV), TSV-less interposers, and heterogeneous integration are used to improve signal integrity, power and thermal distribution, and die yield by breaking complex and large SoCs into smaller chiplets126.”
From Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics (2024) · cites this paper as [126]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics
Shekhar, S., Bogaerts, W., Chrostowski, L., Bowers, J. E., Hochberg, M., Soref, R., & Shastri, B. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lau, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Unimicron Technology Corporation, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Corresponding author
- Lau, John H.
- ORCID
- Lau, John H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-252
- ISSN
- 2156-3950 (ISSN-L)
- 2156-3985
- OpenAlex
- W4206364646
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 210 · 2025: 242 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 34.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › 3D IC and TSV technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Interconnection Networks and Systems
- Keywords
- advanced packaging, chiplets, heterogeneous integration, silicon bridge, fan-out packaging, wafer level chip scale package, low-loss dielectrics, flip-chip bonding, thermocompression bonding, hybrid bonding, interconnect density, substrate design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review