True Random Number Generation Via Sampling From Flat Band-Limited Gaussian Processes
Abstract
We consider a true random number generator based on regularly sampling a thresholded wide sense stationary Gaussian noise source of which power spectral density is assumed to be flat between two known frequencies and zero everywhere else. We employ per-sample joint entropy of the resulting bit sequence as the main figure of merit and present novel analytical results on the optimum choice of the sampling period that ensures maximal randomness of the resulting bit sequence together with numerical results. In addition, we provide new results that follow from autocorrelation function of the noise source and introduce a new related metric, termed “spectral correlation” to quantify the pairwise dependence among the generated bits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Gov, N. C., Mihcak, M. K., & Ergun, S.
- Affiliations
- Boğaziçi University (TR)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1044-1051
- ISSN
- 1549-8328 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0806
- OpenAlex
- W2018906563
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
- Keywords
- true random number generation, thresholding, joint entropy, autocorrelation function, spectral correlation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review