Cited by 14Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataRecommender Systems and TechniquesCryptography and Data Security

Federated Matrix Factorization Recommendation Based on Secret Sharing for Privacy Preserving

Zheng, Xiaoyao, Guan, Manping, Jia, Xianmin, Sun, Liping, Luo, Yonglong·2024·IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems

Abstract

Traditional recommendation systems require users to upload local data to the server to generate recommendation results. In this process, users’ privacy is easy to disclose. Federated recommendations can solve the problem of local data privacy leakage, but the intermediate computing results are not protected. The existing work mainly protects the information in this process through encryption or disturbance schemes, which will result in complex calculations or low accuracy. Also, the two schemes only protect the rating data and process parameter information, but the existence information is not protected. Aiming at the above problems, this article proposes a federated matrix factorization based on secret sharing (FMFSS) to protect users’ privacy. The parameters are randomly divided into pieces, and then, the secret sharing technology is used to transmit private information between user–user and user–server, which does not introduce additional encryption cost and ensures value privacy, process privacy, and existence privacy. In addition, this article introduces the user–item interaction value, which is transmitted to the server with gradient information. In this way, the real gradient of the user cannot be inferred from the information received by the server from all parties, but the aggregated final average parameter information is real. The experimental comparison with the existing work and the analysis of computation time show that the proposed method can ensure the accuracy…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcss.2023.3322824

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Zheng, X., Guan, M., Jia, X., Sun, L., & Luo, Y.
Affiliations
Anhui Normal University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Published
2024-06
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
3525-3535
ISSN
  • 2329-924X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-7476
OpenAlex
W4387682271
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (62272006)
  • Major Natural Science Research Project for Anhui Universities (2023AH040026)
  • Key Research and Development Project for Wuhu City (2022yf55)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2108085MF214)
  • Key Program in the Youth Elite Support Plan in Universities of Anhui Province (gxyqZD2019010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
secret sharing, privacy-preserving recommendation, user-item interactions, gradient privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review