Cited by 3Advanced Control Systems OptimizationControl Systems and IdentificationFault Detection and Control Systems

Phased Long Short-Term Memory-Based Predictive Control of Chemical Processes With Asynchronous and Delayed Measurements

Open access
Wu, Wanlu, Wang, Yujia, Zhang, Haohao, Zhang, Ming-Qing, Chiu, Min-Sen, Wu, Zhe·2025·IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology

Abstract

This work develops novel machine learning modeling and predictive control techniques for nonlinear chemical systems that experience asynchronous and delayed measurements that result in missingness in both offline and online data collections. Specifically, a phased long short-term memory (PLSTM) network is used to learn the process dynamics amidst the missingness in the data measurements, during the offline training process. The generalization performance of PLSTM is theoretically studied on the basis of statistical machine learning theory to better understand the capabilities of PLSTM models. The PLSTM model is subsequently employed to forecast the evolution of states for a Lyapunov-based model predictive control (LMPC). The proposed PLSTM-based LMPC is designed to account for data loss and delays in real-time implementation, and guarantees the closed-loop stability of nonlinear systems subjected to missing real-time data, provided that there is an upper bound on the number of consecutively missing real-time data. Finally, two chemical processes including an extractive dividing wall column (EDWC) and a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of PLSTM modeling and predictive control methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcst.2025.3587908

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Seborg, 2016, Process Dynamics and Control
  2. Neil, Phased LSTM: Accelerating recurrent network training for long or event-based sequences, 3889

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Wu, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, M.-Q., Chiu, M.-S., & Wu, Z.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
Published
2025-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
2439-2454
ISSN
  • 1063-6536 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0865
  • 2374-0159
OpenAlex
W6940659363
Cited by
3
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education Tier 1 (22-5367-A0001)
  • ASTAR YIRG (M22K3c0093)
  • National Research Foundation Competitive Research Programme (27-2021-0001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
missing data, delayed measurements, asynchronous measurements, model predictive control, Lyapunov-based model predictive control, nonlinear chemical processes, state forecasting, closed-loop stability, continuous stirred tank reactor, generalization bounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review