An efficient security system for CABAC bin-strings of H.264/SVC
Abstract
The distribution of copyrighted scalable video content to differing digital devices requires protection during rendering and transmission. In this paper, we propose a complete security system for H.264/scalable video coding (SVC) video codec and present a solution for the bit-rate and format compliance problems by careful selection of entropy coder syntax elements (bin-strings) for selective encryption (SE), and the problem of managing multiple layer encryption keys for scalable video distribution. A standard key management protocol, multimedia Internet keying protocol, is implemented for the hierarchical key generation mechanism, in which a subscriber has only one encryption key to unlock all scalable layers that have been subscribed to. The evaluation demonstrates the resulting video quality degradation arising from SE for manyCIFand 4CIFtest video sequences, without there being any impact upon the bit-rate or format compliancy, and with small computational delay. The security and statistical analysis performed further verify the effectiveness of the proposed security system for H.264/SVC. The proposed system is highly suitable for video distribution to users who have subscribed to a varying degree of video quality on devices with medium to high computational resources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple residual parameters output from a CABAC entropy coder are suitable for encryption without compromising compression efficiency.
“There are multiple residual parameters output from a CABAC entropy coder [51] that are suitable for encryption without compromising its compression efficiency.”
From VQProtect: Lightweight Visual Quality Protection for Error-Prone Selectively Encrypted Video Streaming (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
Overview on Selective Encryption of Image and Video: Challenges and Perspectives
Massoudi, A., Lefebvre, F., De Vleeschouwer, C., Macq, B., & Quisquater, J.-J. (2008) · EURASIP Journal on Information Security · doi:10.1155/2008/179290 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gillani, S. M., Asghar, M. N., Shifa, A., Abdullah, S., Kanwal, N., & Fleury, M. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24060755 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Asghar, M. N., & Ghanbari, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Essex (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-437
- ISSN
- 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2205
- OpenAlex
- W2120855246
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Rights Management and Security
- Keywords
- H.264/SVC, scalable video coding, selective encryption, key management, MIP, video quality degradation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review