Cited by 83Video Coding and Compression TechnologiesAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesImage and Video Quality Assessment

A Fast CU Size Decision Algorithm for HEVC

Jaeho Lee, Seongwan Kim, Kyungmin Lim, Sangyoun Lee·2015·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

Abstract

High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) employs a coding unit (CU), prediction unit (PU), and transform unit (TU) based on the quadtree coding tree unit (CTU) structure to improve coding efficiency. However, the computational complexity increases greatly because the rate-distortion (RD) optimization process should be performed for all CUs, PUs, and TUs to obtain the optimal CTU partition. In this paper, a fast CU size decision algorithm is proposed to reduce the encoder complexity of HEVC. Based on the statistical analysis, three approaches with SKIP mode decision (SMD), CU skip estimation (CUSE), and early CU termination (ECUT) are considered. In SMD, it is determined that the remaining modes except for SKIP mode are preformed or not. CUSE and ECUT determine that larger CU sizes and smaller CU sizes are coded or not, respectively. Thresholds for SMD, CUSE, and ECUT are designed based on Bayes' rule with a complexity factor. Update process is performed to estimate the statistical parameters for SMD, CUSE, and ECUT considering the characteristic of RD cost. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed CU size decision algorithm significantly reduces computational complexity by 69% on average with 2.99% Bjøntegaard difference bitrate (BDBR) increase for random access. The complexity reduction and BDBR increase for low delay are 68% and 2.46%, respectively. The experimental results also show that our proposed scheme performs well for various characteristic of sequences and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsvt.2014.2339612

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 18 · Cited by 83

Authors
Lee, J., Kim, S., Lim, K., & Lee, S.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2015-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
411-421
ISSN
  • 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2205
OpenAlex
W2040099680
Cited by
83
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Digital Media and Communication Research and Development Team, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Seoul, Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
Keywords
HEVC, coding unit size decision, rate-distortion optimization, encoder complexity reduction, Bayes decision rule, parameter estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review