Cited by 154Image and Video Quality AssessmentDigital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

In-Capture Mobile Video Distortions: A Study of Subjective Behavior and Objective Algorithms

Ghadiyaram, Deepti, Pan, Janice, Bovik, Alan C., Moorthy, Anush Krishna, Panda, Prasanjit, Yang, Kai-Chieh·2018·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

Abstract

Digital videos often contain visual distortions that are introduced by the camera's hardware or processing software during the capture process. These distortions often detract from a viewer's quality of experience. Understanding how human observers perceive the visual quality of digital videos is of great importance to camera designers. Thus, the development of automatic objective methods that accurately quantify the impact of visual distortions on perception has greatly accelerated. Video quality algorithm design and verification require realistic databases of distorted videos and human judgments of them. However, most current publicly available video quality databases have been created under highly controlled conditions using graded, simulated, and post-capture distortions (such as jitter and compression artifacts) on high-quality videos. The commercial plethora of hand-held mobile video capture devices produces videos often afflicted by a variety of complex distortions generated during the capturing process. These in-capture distortions are not well-modeled by the synthetic, post-capture distortions found in existing VQA databases. Toward overcoming this limitation, we designed and created a new database that we call the LIVE-Qualcomm mobile in-capture video quality database, comprising a total of 208 videos, which model six common in-capture distortions. We also conducted a subjective quality assessment study using this database, in which each video was assessed by 39 unique subjects. Furthermore, we evaluated several top-performing no-reference IQA and VQA algorithms on the new database and studied how real-world in-capture distortions challenge both human viewers as well as automatic perceptual quality prediction models. The new database is freely available at: http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/incaptureDatabase/index.html.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsvt.2017.2707479

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CVD2014 and LIVE-Qualcomm only modeled capture distortions on small numbers of not very diverse unique contents.

    “These two databases, however, only modeled (camera) capture distortions on small numbers of not very diverse unique contents.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 154

Authors
Ghadiyaram, D., Pan, J., Bovik, A. C., Moorthy, A. K., Panda, P., & Yang, K.-C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Qualcomm (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2018-09
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
2061-2077
ISSN
  • 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2205
OpenAlex
W2617811665
Cited by
154
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Qualcomm
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
video quality assessment, no-reference image quality assessment, video quality database, subjective quality assessment, visual perception, perceptual quality prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review