Cited by 128Image and Video Quality AssessmentVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Spatiotemporal Feature Integration and Model Fusion for Full Reference Video Quality Assessment

Open access
Bampis, Christos G., Li, Zhi, Bovik, Alan C.·2019·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

Abstract

The recently developed video multi-method assessment fusion (VMAF) framework integrates multiple quality-aware features to accurately predict the video quality. However, the VMAF does not yet exploit important principles of temporal perception that are relevant to the perceptual video distortion measurement. Here, we propose two improvements to the VMAF framework, called spatiotemporal VMAF and ensemble VMAF, which leverage perceptually-motivated space-time features that are efficiently calculated at multiple scales. We also conducted a large subjective video study, which we have found to be an excellent resource for training our feature-based approaches. In rigorous experiments, we found that the proposed algorithms demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance on multiple video applications. The compared algorithms will be made available as a part of the open source package in https://github.com/Netflix/vmaf.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2868262

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bampis, C. G., Li, Z., & Bovik, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Netflix (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2019-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
2256-2270
ISSN
  • 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2205
OpenAlex
W2796677919
Cited by
128
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Netflix Inc.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
VMAF, model fusion, ensemble learning, time perception, multi-scale features, video quality prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review