Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Survey of Open-World Person Re-Identification

Leng, Qingming, Ye, Mang, Tian, Qi·2020·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

Abstract

Person re-identification (re-ID) has been a popular topic in computer vision and pattern recognition communities for a decade. Several important milestones such as metric-based and deeply-learned re-ID in recent years have promoted this topic. However, most existing re-ID works are designed for closed-world scenarios rather than realistic open-world settings, which limits the practical application of the re-ID technique. On one hand, the performance of the latest re-ID methods has surpassed the human-level performance on several commonly used benchmarks (e.g., Market1501 and CUHK03), which are collected from closed-world scenarios. On the other hand, open-world tasks that are less developed and more challenging have received increasing attention in the re-ID community. Therefore, this paper starts the first attempt to analyze the trends of open-world re-ID and summarizes them from both narrow and generalized perspectives. In the narrow perspective, open-world re-ID is regarded as person verification (i.e., open-set re-ID) instead of person identification, that is, the query person may not occur in the gallery set. In the generalized perspective, application-driven methods that are designed for specific applications are defined as generalized open-world re-ID. Their settings are usually close to realistic application requirements. Specifically, this survey mainly includes the following four points for open-world re-ID: 1) analyzing the discrepancies between closed- and open-world scenarios; 2) describing the developments of existing open-set re-ID works and their limitations; 3) introducing specific application-driven works from three aspects, namely, raw data, practical procedure, and efficiency; and 4) summarizing the state-of-the-art methods and future directions for open-world re-ID. This survey on open-world re-ID provides a guidance for improving the usability of re-ID technique in practical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2898940

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Leng, Q., Ye, M., & Tian, Q.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2020-04
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
1092-1108
ISSN
  • 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2205
OpenAlex
W2912406707
Cited by
318
References
2
FWCI
15.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Open-World Person Re-Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2898940
The paper
Leng, Q., Ye, M., & Tian, Q. (2020). A Survey of Open-World Person Re-Identification. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2898940

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.