The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constructing the L2-Graph for Robust Subspace Learning and Subspace Clustering
Open accessAbstract
Under the framework of graph-based learning, the key to robust subspace clustering and subspace learning is to obtain a good similarity graph that eliminates the effects of errors and retains only connections between the data points from the same subspace (i.e., intrasubspace data points). Recent works achieve good performance by modeling errors into their objective functions to remove the errors from the inputs. However, these approaches face the limitations that the structure of errors should be known prior and a complex convex problem must be solved. In this paper, we present a novel method to eliminate the effects of the errors from the projection space (representation) rather than from the input space. We first prove that ℓ1-, ℓ2-, ℓ∞-, and nuclear-norm-based linear projection spaces share the property of intrasubspace projection dominance, i.e., the coefficients over intrasubspace data points are larger than those over intersubspace data points. Based on this property, we introduce a method to construct a sparse similarity graph, called L2-graph. The subspace clustering and subspace learning algorithms are developed upon L2-graph. We conduct comprehensive experiment on subspace learning, image clustering, and motion segmentation and consider several quantitative benchmarks classification/clustering accuracy, normalized mutual information, and running time. Results show that L2-graph outperforms many state-of-the-art methods in our experiments, including L1-graph, low rank representation (LRR), and latent LRR, least square regression, sparse subspace clustering, and locally linear representation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1996) · Cited by 20,179
Normalized cuts and image segmentation
Shi, J., & Malik, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.868688 · Cited by 15,502
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
A tutorial on spectral clustering
von Luxburg, U. (2007) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z · Cited by 10,349
Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 · Cited by 9,648
Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation
Wright, J., Yang, A. Y., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S. S., & Ma, Y. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.79 · Cited by 9,388
On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm
Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., & Weiss, Y. (2001) · Cited by 8,159
Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation
Belkin, M., & Niyogi, P. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603321780317 · Cited by 7,621
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, X., Yu, Z., Yi, Z., & Tang, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1053-1066
- ISSN
- 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2275
- OpenAlex
- W1884731728
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 25.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructing the L2-Graph for Robust Subspace Learning and Subspace Clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcyb.2016.2536752
- The paper
- Peng, X., Yu, Z., Yi, Z., & Tang, H. (2017). Constructing the L2-Graph for Robust Subspace Learning and Subspace Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2016.2536752
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.