The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locally Weighted Ensemble Clustering
Open accessAbstract
Due to its ability to combine multiple base clusterings into a probably better and more robust clustering, the ensemble clustering technique has been attracting increasing attention in recent years. Despite the significant success, one limitation to most of the existing ensemble clustering methods is that they generally treat all base clusterings equally regardless of their reliability, which makes them vulnerable to low-quality base clusterings. Although some efforts have been made to (globally) evaluate and weight the base clusterings, yet these methods tend to view each base clustering as an individual and neglect the local diversity of clusters inside the same base clustering. It remains an open problem how to evaluate the reliability of clusters and exploit the local diversity in the ensemble to enhance the consensus performance, especially, in the case when there is no access to data features or specific assumptions on data distribution. To address this, in this paper, we propose a novel ensemble clustering approach based on ensemble-driven cluster uncertainty estimation and local weighting strategy. In particular, the uncertainty of each cluster is estimated by considering the cluster labels in the entire ensemble via an entropic criterion. A novel ensemble-driven cluster validity measure is introduced, and a locally weighted co-association matrix is presented to serve as a summary for the ensemble of diverse clusters. With the local diversity in ensembles exploited, two novel consensus functions are further proposed. Extensive experiments on a variety of real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach over the state-of-the-art.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,155
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means
Jain, A. K. (2010) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011 · Cited by 9,368
On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm
Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., & Weiss, Y. (2001) · Cited by 8,159
Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points
Frey, B. J., & Dueck, D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136800 · Cited by 6,758
Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods
Rand, W. M. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356 · Cited by 6,566
Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R. P. W., & Matas, J. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.667881 · Cited by 5,290
Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms
Bagui, S. C. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s320 · Cited by 3,202
Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms
Kuncheva, L. I. (2004) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471660264 · Cited by 3,005
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, D., Wang, C.-D., & Lai, J.-H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1460-1473
- ISSN
- 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2275
- OpenAlex
- W2952171869
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 18.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locally Weighted Ensemble Clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcyb.2017.2702343
- The paper
- Huang, D., Wang, C.-D., & Lai, J.-H. (2018). Locally Weighted Ensemble Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2017.2702343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.