Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making Sense of Spatio-Temporal Preserving Representations for EEG-Based Human Intention Recognition

Open access
Zhang, Dalin, Yao, Lina, Chen, Kaixuan, Wang, Sen, Chang, Xiaojun, Liu, Yunhao·2020·IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics

Abstract

Brain-computer interface (BCI) is a system empowering humans to communicate with or control the outside world with exclusively brain intentions. Electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI is one of the promising solutions due to its convenient and portable instruments. Despite the extensive research of EEG in recent years, it is still challenging to interpret EEG signals effectively due to its nature of noise and difficulties in capturing the inconspicuous relations between EEG signals and specific brain activities. Most existing works either only consider EEG as chain-like sequences while neglecting complex dependencies between adjacent signals or requiring complex preprocessing. In this paper, we introduce two deep learning-based frameworks with novel spatio-temporal preserving representations of raw EEG streams to precisely identify human intentions. The two frameworks consist of both convolutional and recurrent neural networks effectively exploring the preserved spatial and temporal information in either a cascade or a parallel manner. Extensive experiments on a large scale movement intention EEG dataset (108 subjects, 3 145 160 EEG records) have demonstrated that the proposed frameworks achieve high accuracy of 98.3% and outperform a set of state-of-the-art and baseline models. The developed models are further evaluated with a real-world brain typing BCI and achieve a recognition accuracy of 93% over five instruction intentions suggesting good generalization over different kinds of intentions and BCI systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcyb.2019.2905157

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1007/978-981-13-1747-7_72 · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1747-7_72
  2. 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2598362 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2016.2598362
  3. bashivan, 2016, Learning representations from EEG with deep recurrent-convolutional neural networks, Proc Int Conf Learn Represent, 1
  4. 10.1063/1.5090244 · doi:10.1063/1.5090244

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, D., Yao, L., Chen, K., Wang, S., Chang, X., & Liu, Y.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
Published
2020-07
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
3033-3044
ISSN
  • 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2275
OpenAlex
W2940740645
Cited by
365
References
49
FWCI
23.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Sense of Spatio-Temporal Preserving Representations for EEG-Based Human Intention Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcyb.2019.2905157
The paper
Zhang, D., Yao, L., Chen, K., Wang, S., Chang, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Making Sense of Spatio-Temporal Preserving Representations for EEG-Based Human Intention Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2019.2905157

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.