Cited by 32Flow Measurement and AnalysisNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesOil and Gas Production Techniques

Development of Gas–Liquid Flow Regimes Identification Using a Noninvasive Ultrasonic Sensor, Belt-Shape Features, and Convolutional Neural Network in an S-Shaped Riser

Open access
Nnabuife, Somtochukwu Godfrey, Kuang, Boyu, Whidborne, James F., Rana, Zeeshan A.·2023·IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics

Abstract

The problem of classifying gas-liquid two-phase flow regimes from ultrasonic signals is considered. A new method, belt-shaped features (BSFs), is proposed for performing feature extraction on the preprocessed data. A convolutional neural network (CNN/ConvNet)-based classifier is then applied to categorize into one of the four flow regimes: 1) annular; 2) churn; 3) slug; or 4) bubbly. The proposed ConvNet classifier includes multiple stages of convolution and pooling layers, which both decrease the dimension and learn the classification features. Using experimental data collected from an industrial-scale multiphase flow facility, the proposed ConvNet classifier achieved 97.40%, 94.57%, and 94.94% accuracy, respectively, for the training set, testing set, and validation set. These results demonstrate the applicability of the BSF features and the ConvNet classifier for flow regime classification in industrial applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcyb.2021.3084860

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nnabuife, S. G., Kuang, B., Whidborne, J. F., & Rana, Z. A.
Affiliations
Cranfield University (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
Published
2023-01
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
3-17
ISSN
  • 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2275
OpenAlex
W3179746777
Cited by
32
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Flow Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Oil and Gas Production Techniques
Keywords
gas-liquid two-phase flow, flow regime identification, ultrasonic sensing, non-invasive measurement, feature extraction, convolutional neural networks, annular flow, churn flow, slug flow, bubbly flow, multiphase flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review