Development of Gas–Liquid Flow Regimes Identification Using a Noninvasive Ultrasonic Sensor, Belt-Shape Features, and Convolutional Neural Network in an S-Shaped Riser
Open accessAbstract
The problem of classifying gas-liquid two-phase flow regimes from ultrasonic signals is considered. A new method, belt-shaped features (BSFs), is proposed for performing feature extraction on the preprocessed data. A convolutional neural network (CNN/ConvNet)-based classifier is then applied to categorize into one of the four flow regimes: 1) annular; 2) churn; 3) slug; or 4) bubbly. The proposed ConvNet classifier includes multiple stages of convolution and pooling layers, which both decrease the dimension and learn the classification features. Using experimental data collected from an industrial-scale multiphase flow facility, the proposed ConvNet classifier achieved 97.40%, 94.57%, and 94.94% accuracy, respectively, for the training set, testing set, and validation set. These results demonstrate the applicability of the BSF features and the ConvNet classifier for flow regime classification in industrial applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since Hinton proposed the deep belief networks (DBN) in 2006, deep network-based methods have accomplished significant achievements in various sectors.
“However, since Hinton proposed the deep belief networks (DBN) in 2006 [90], the deep network-based method has accomplished significant achievements in various sectors [91,92,93,94].”
From Semantic Terrain Segmentation in the Navigation Vision of Planetary Rovers—A Systematic Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [94]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
FUIQA: Fetal Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment with Deep Convolutional Networks
Wu, L., Cheng, J.-Z., Li, S., Lei, B., Wang, T., & Ni, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2671898 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kuang, B., Gu, C., Rana, Z. A., Zhao, Y., Sun, S., & Nnabuife, S. G. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22218393 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Nnabuife, S. G., Kuang, B., Whidborne, J. F., & Rana, Z. A.
- Affiliations
- Cranfield University (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-17
- ISSN
- 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2275
- OpenAlex
- W3179746777
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Flow Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Oil and Gas Production Techniques
- Keywords
- gas-liquid two-phase flow, flow regime identification, ultrasonic sensing, non-invasive measurement, feature extraction, convolutional neural networks, annular flow, churn flow, slug flow, bubbly flow, multiphase flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review