Performance Evaluation of Multi-Vendor Grid-Forming Inverters for Grid-Connected Operation Through Hardware Experimentation
Open accessAbstract
Existing real-world projects of grid-forming (GFM) inverters that operate in parallel with power grids are typically sized between dozens and a few hundred megawatts, according to a recent white paper on GFM inverters by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation. These large systems are often difficult to evaluate prior to deployment because of their large size. The performance of smaller GFM inverters (from dozens to a few hundred kVA) that operate in parallel with power grids (distribution systems) is even less understood. There is an opportunity to better understand these systems through hardware testing under controlled laboratory conditions. Therefore, this paper presents the functional performance evaluation tests of multiple (three) commercial GFM inverters when they operate in parallel with the grid through hardware experiments. The goal of these tests is to explore and benchmark the GFM inverters’ functionalities and dynamic response when they are operated in parallel with power grids to eventually develop universal specifications for GFM inverters. Both steady-state (changing the inverters’ frequency and voltage droop) and transient (adding step changes to the grid’s frequency/voltage) tests are performed for each GFM inverter with the same testing circuit and testing protocol. The experimental results indicate that 1) the GFM inverters can be dispatched through frequency and voltage droop intercepts to output the target power when they are operated in parallel with the grid; and 2) the GFM inverters automatically respond to system frequency and voltage events to output the needed power; however, all the GFM inverters show stability issues when absorbing reactive power from the grid.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Wang, J., Ganguly, S., & Kroposki, B.
- Affiliations
- National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
- Venue
- 2024 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-05-06
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W4399064054
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Locations
- IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Office of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Islanding Detection in Power Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Keywords
- grid-forming inverters, inverter performance evaluation, frequency droop, voltage droop, distribution networks, reactive power absorption, inverter stability, grid-connected operation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review