The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anonymous Two-Factor Authentication in Distributed Systems: Certain Goals Are Beyond Attainment
Abstract
Despite two decades of intensive research, it remains a challenge to design a practical anonymous two-factor authentication scheme, for the designers are confronted with an impressive list of security requirements (e.g., resistance to smart card loss attack) and desirable attributes (e.g., local password update). Numerous solutions have been proposed, yet most of them are shortly found either unable to satisfy some critical security requirements or short of a few important features. To overcome this unsatisfactory situation, researchers often work around it in hopes of a new proposal (but no one has succeeded so far), while paying little attention to the fundamental question: whether or not there are inherent limitations that prevent us from designing an “ideal” scheme that satisfies all the desirable goals? In this work, we aim to provide a definite answer to this question. We first revisit two foremost proposals, i.e. Tsai et al.'s scheme and Li's scheme, revealing some subtleties and challenges in designing such schemes. Then, we systematically explore the inherent conflicts and unavoidable trade-offs among the design criteria. Our results indicate that, under the current widely accepted adversarial model, certain goals are beyond attainment. This also suggests a negative answer to the open problem left by Huang et al. in 2014. To the best of knowledge, the present study makes the first step towards understanding the underlying evaluation metric for anonymous two-factor authentication, which we believe will facilitate better design of anonymous two-factor protocols that offer acceptable trade-offs among usability, security and privacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldwasser, S., & Micali, S. (1984) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(84)90070-9 · Cited by 2,603
Entity Authentication and Key Distribution
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48329-2_21 · Cited by 1,752
Analysis of Key-Exchange Protocols and Their Use for Building Secure Channels
Canetti, R., & Krawczyk, H. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44987-6_28 · Cited by 1,653
Authenticated Key Exchange Secure against Dictionary Attacks
Bellare, M., Pointcheval, D., & Rogaway, P. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45539-6_11 · Cited by 1,503
Chaum, D., & van Heyst, E. (1991) · Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques · Cited by 1,492
The Science of Guessing: Analyzing an Anonymized Corpus of 70 Million Passwords
Bonneau, J. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2012.49 · Cited by 687
Fault Injection Attacks on Cryptographic Devices: Theory, Practice, and Countermeasures
Barenghi, A., Breveglieri, L., Koren, I., & Naccache, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2188769 · Cited by 609
Maji, H. K., Prabhakaran, M., & Rosulek, M. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19074-2_24 · Cited by 437
A dynamic ID-based remote user authentication scheme
Das, M. L., Saxena, A., & Gulati, V. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2004.1309441 · Cited by 434
Secure Integration of Asymmetric and Symmetric Encryption Schemes
Fujisaki, E., & Okamoto, T. (2013) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/s00145-011-9114-1 · Cited by 402
Cited by
Two birds with one stone: two-factor authentication with security beyond conventional bound
Wang, D., & Wang, P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2016.2605087 · Cited by 539
Self-citationWang, D., Li, W., & Wang, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2834351 · Cited by 272
Self-citationQiu, S., Wang, D., Xu, G., & Kumari, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2020.3022797 · Cited by 224
Self-citationSecure and efficient user authentication scheme for multi-gateway wireless sensor networks
Srinivas, J., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Mishra, D. (2017) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.11.002 · Cited by 158
Ferrag, M. A., Maglaras, L., Derhab, A., & Janicke, H. (2020) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-019-00612-5 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., He, D., Wang, P., & Chu, C.-H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 428-442
- ISSN
- 1545-5971 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0018
- 2160-9209
- OpenAlex
- W1967308747
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 47.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anonymous Two-Factor Authentication in Distributed Systems: Certain Goals Are Beyond Attainment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tdsc.2014.2355850
- The paper
- Wang, D., He, D., Wang, P., & Chu, C.-H. (2015). Anonymous Two-Factor Authentication in Distributed Systems: Certain Goals Are Beyond Attainment. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2014.2355850
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.