The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Cyber Attack Detection in Industrial Control Systems Using Lightweight Neural Networks and PCA
Open accessAbstract
Industrial control systems (ICSs) are widely used and vital to industry and society. Their failure can have severe impact on both the economy and human life. Hence, these systems have become an attractive target for physical and cyber attacks alike. In this article, we examine an attack detection method based on simple and lightweight neural networks, namely, 1D convolutional neural networks and autoencoders. We apply these networks to both the time and frequency domains of the data and discuss the pros and cons of each representation approach. The suggested method is evaluated on three popular public datasets, and detection rates matching or exceeding previously published detection results are achieved, while demonstrating a small footprint, short training and detection times, and generality. We also show the effectiveness of PCA, which, given proper data preprocessing and feature selection, can provide high attack detection rates in many settings. Finally, we study the proposed method’s robustness against adversarial attacks that exploit inherent blind spots of neural networks to evade detection while achieving their intended physical effect. Our results show that the proposed method is robust to such evasion attacks: in order to evade detection, the attacker is forced to sacrifice the desired physical impact on the system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143
Chapelle, O., Schölkopf, B., & Zien, A. (2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001 · Cited by 4,642
Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning
Goldberg, D. E., & Holland, J. H. (1988) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022602019183 · Cited by 3,193
Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning
Biggio, B., & Roli, F. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.023 · Cited by 1,563
Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations
Andreou, A., Venkatadri, G., Goga, O., Gummadi, K. P., Loiseau, P., & Mislove, A. E. (2018) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2018.23191 · Cited by 1,505
Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis
Ku, W., Storer, R. H., & Georgakis, C. (1995) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/0169-7439(95)00076-3 · Cited by 1,484
Anomaly Detection Using Autoencoders with Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Sakurada, M., & Yairi, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the MLSDA 2014 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning for Sensory Data Analysis · doi:10.1145/2689746.2689747 · Cited by 1,438
MAD-GAN: Multivariate Anomaly Detection for Time Series Data with Generative Adversarial Networks
Li, D., Chen, D., Jin, B., Shi, L., Goh, J., & Ng, S.-K. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30490-4_56 · Cited by 1,323
Cyber-Physical Systems Security—A Survey
Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., & Luo, B. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2703172 · Cited by 1,185
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1007/978–3-319-71368-7_8 · DOI · Paper page
- Morris, Industrial control system simulation and data logging for intrusion detection system research, 3
- Goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning, 1
- Croarkin, 2006, NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods, Nist/Sematech
- 10.1007/BF00113892 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Learning Based Attack Detection for Cyber-Physical System Cybersecurity: A Survey
Zhang, J., Pan, L., Han, Q., Chen, C., Wen, S., & Xiang, Y. (2021) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2021.1004261 · Cited by 450
A Survey on Industrial Control System Testbeds and Datasets for Security Research
Conti, M., Donadel, D., & Turrin, F. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3094360 · Cited by 284
Hương, T. T., Bac, T. P., Long, D. M., Luong, T. D., Dan, N. M., Quang, L. A., Cong, L. T., Thang, B. D., & Tran, K. P. (2021) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2021.103509 · Cited by 201
A survey on deep learning for cybersecurity: Progress, challenges, and opportunities
Macas, M., Wu, C., & Fuertes, W. (2022) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109032 · Cited by 202
A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning Methodologies with Emphasis in Water Resources Management
Drogkoula, M., Kokkinos, K., & Samaras, N. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132212147 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Kravchik, M., & Shabtai, A.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
- Published
- 2022-07-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2179-2197
- ISSN
- 1545-5971 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0018
- 2160-9209
- OpenAlex
- W3119781401
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 25
- FWCI
- 16.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (publishedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology (830927)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- cyberattack detection, industrial control systems, lightweight neural networks, 1D convolutional neural network, autoencoder, principal component analysis, adversarial attacks, evasion attacks, physical assault, detection robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review