Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 63Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fitness uniform optimization

Open access
Hutter, M., Legg, S.·2006·IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation

Abstract

In evolutionary algorithms, the fitness of a population increases with time by mutating and recombining individuals and by a biased selection of fitter individuals. The right selection pressure is critical in ensuring sufficient optimization progress on the one hand and in preserving genetic diversity to be able to escape from local optima on the other hand. Motivated by a universal similarity relation on the individuals, we propose a new selection scheme, which is uniform in the fitness values. It generates selection pressure toward sparsely populated fitness regions, not necessarily toward higher fitness, as is the case for all other selection schemes. We show analytically on a simple example that the new selection scheme can be much more effective than standard selection schemes. We also propose a new deletion scheme which achieves a similar result via deletion and show how such a scheme preserves genetic diversity more effectively than standard approaches. We compare the performance of the new schemes to tournament selection and random deletion on an artificial deceptive problem and a range of NP hard problems: traveling salesman, set covering, and satisfiability

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tevc.2005.863127

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Goldberg, 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning
  2. Blickle, A mathematical analysis of tournament selection, 9
  3. Holland, 1975, Adpatation in Natural and Artificial Systems
  4. Whitley, The GENITOR algorithm and selection pressure: why rank-based allocation of reproductive trials is best, 116
  5. Baker, Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms, 101
  6. Bäck, A survey of evolution strategies, 2
  7. Herdy, 1992, Reproductive isolation as strategy parameter in hierarchically organized evolution strategies, 207
  8. Goldberg, Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization, 41
  9. Collins, Selection in massively parallel genetic algorithms, 249
  10. Rudolph, On takeover times in spatially structured populations: array and ring, 144
  11. Cavicchio, 1970, Adaptive search using simulated evolution
  12. Hutter, Fitness uniform selection to preserve genetic diversity, 783
  13. Legg, Tournament versus fitness uniform selection, 2144
  14. Legg, Fitness uniform deletion for robust optimization, 1271
  15. Hutter, 1991, Implementierung eines Klassifizierungs-Systems
  16. Rogers, 1999, Modeling the dynamics of a steady-state genetic algorithm, 57
  17. Johnson, 1997, The traveling salesman problem: a case study, 215
  18. Applegate, 2000, Chained Lin-Kernighan for large traveling salesman problems
  19. Goldberg, Loci and the traveling salesman problem, 154
  20. Beasley, 2003, Or-library
  21. Crescenzi, 2003, A compendium of NP optimization problems
  22. Hoos, SATLIB: An online resource for research on SAT, 283

Cited by

  • Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models

    Romera-Paredes, B., Barekatain, M., Novikov, A., Balog, M., Kumar, M. P., Dupont, E., Ruiz, F. J. R., Ellenberg, J. S., Wang, P., Fawzi, O., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6 · Cited by 544

    “…to Lexicase 57 in that both approaches consider a set of test cases for scoring an individual, and it is related to fitness uniform optimization 58 , which also clusters individuals on the basis of their fitness value; however, we sample the clusters on the basis of their score instead of…”
    Background

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Hutter, M., & Legg, S.
Affiliations
Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Published
2006-10
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
568-589
ISSN
1089-778X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117336417
Cited by
63
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (107616, 67712, 200020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
selection pressure, genetic diversity, tournament selection, random deletion, deceptive problems, NP-hard combinatorial optimization, traveling salesman problem, set covering problem, satisfiability, local optima avoidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.