The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalizing Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Computation
Abstract
Using surrogate models in evolutionary search provides an efficient means of handling today's complex applications plagued with increasing high-computational needs. Recent surrogate-assisted evolutionary frameworks have relied on the use of a variety of different modeling approaches to approximate the complex problem landscape. From these recent studies, one main research issue is with the choice of modeling scheme used, which has been found to affect the performance of evolutionary search significantly. Given that theoretical knowledge available for making a decision on an approximation modela prioriis very much limited, this paper describes a generalization of surrogate-assisted evolutionary frameworks for optimization of problems with objectives and constraints that are computationally expensive to evaluate. The generalized evolutionary framework unifies diverse surrogate models synergistically in the evolutionary search. In particular, it focuses on attaining reliable search performance in the surrogate-assisted evolutionary framework by working on two major issues: 1) to mitigate the'curse of uncertainty'robustly, and 2) to benefit from the 'bless of uncertainty.' The backbone of the generalized framework is a surrogate-assisted memetic algorithm that conducts simultaneous local searches usingensembleandsmoothingsurrogate models, with the aims of generating reliable fitness prediction and search improvements simultaneously. Empirical study on commonly used optimization benchmark problems indicates that the generalized framework is capable of attaining reliable, high quality, and efficient performance under a limited computational budget.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Neural networks for pattern recognition
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5500 · Cited by 18,538
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Deb, K., & Kalyanmoy, D. (2001) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 14,918
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 · Cited by 8,070
Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results
Zitzler, E., Deb, K., & Thiele, L. (2000) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/106365600568202 · Cited by 5,697
Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems
(2007) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Series · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36797-2 · Cited by 5,686
A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., & Meyarivan, T. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83 · Cited by 5,289
Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review
Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C. M., & da Fonseca, V. G. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2003.810758 · Cited by 4,330
Biogeography-Based Optimization
Simon, D. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2008.919004 · Cited by 4,305
Cited by
Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges
Jin, Y. (2011) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2011.05.001 · Cited by 1,514
Self-citationA Competitive Swarm Optimizer for Large Scale Optimization
Cheng, R., & Jin, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2322602 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationA social learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for scalable optimization
Cheng, R., & Jin, Y. (2015) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.039 · Cited by 747
Self-citationData-Driven Evolutionary Optimization: An Overview and Case Studies
Jin, Y., Wang, H., Chugh, T., Guo, D., & Miettinen, K. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2018.2869001 · Cited by 686
Self-citationA Multi-Facet Survey on Memetic Computation
Chen, X., Ong, Y.-S., Lim, M.-H., & Tan, K. C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2011.2132725 · Cited by 512
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, D., Jin, Y., Ong, Y.-S., & Sendhoff, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-355
- ISSN
- 1089-778X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0026
- OpenAlex
- W2000503034
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalizing Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Computation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tevc.2009.2027359
- The paper
- Lim, D., Jin, Y., Ong, Y.-S., & Sendhoff, B. (2010). Generalizing Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Computation. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2009.2027359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.