Cited by 339Fuzzy Logic and Control SystemsAdvanced Algebra and LogicMathematical Control Systems and Analysis

On the Fundamental Differences Between Interval Type-2 and Type-1 Fuzzy Logic Controllers

Wu, Dongrui·2012·IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

Interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers (IT2 FLCs) have recently been attracting a lot of research attention. Many reported results have shown that IT2 FLCs are better able to handle uncertainties than their type-1 (T1) counterparts. A challenging question is the following: What are the fundamental differences between IT2 and T1 FLCs? Once the fundamental differences are clear, we can better understand the advantages of IT2 FLCs and, hence, make better use of them. This paper explains two fundamental differences between IT2 and T1 FLCs: 1) Adaptiveness, meaning that the embedded T1 fuzzy sets used to compute the bounds of the type-reduced interval change as input changes; and 2) Novelty, meaning that the upper and lower membership functions of the same IT2 fuzzy set may be used simultaneously in computing each bound of the type-reduced interval. T1 FLCs do not have these properties; thus, a T1 FLC cannot implement the complex control surface of an IT2 FLC given the same rulebase. We also present several methods to visualize and analyze the effects of these two fundamental differences, including the control surface, the P-map, the equivalent generalized T1 fuzzy sets, and the equivalent PI gains. Finally, we examine five alternative type reducers for IT2 FLCs and explain why they do not capture the fundamentals of IT2 FLCs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2186818

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Wu, D.
Affiliations
GE Global Research (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Dongrui
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Published
2012-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
832-848
ISSN
  • 1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0034
OpenAlex
W2145416734
Cited by
339
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 7
FWCI
27.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Mathematical Control Systems and Analysis
Keywords
interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller, type-1 fuzzy logic controller, type reduction, uncertainty management, adaptability, novelty, control surfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review