Cited by 311Fuzzy Logic and Control SystemsAdvanced Algebra and LogicMathematical Control Systems and Analysis

General Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple: A Tutorial

Mendel, Jerry M.·2014·IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

The purpose of this tutorial paper is to make general type-2 fuzzy logic systems (GT2 FLSs) more accessible to fuzzy logic researchers and practitioners, and to expedite their research, designs, and use. To accomplish this, the paper 1) explains four different mathematical representations for general type-2 fuzzy sets (GT2 FSs); 2) demonstrates that for the optimal design of a GT2 FLS, one should use the vertical-slice representation of its GT2 FSs because it is the only one of the four mathematical representations that is parsimonious; 3) shows how to obtain set theoretic and other operations for GT2 FSs using type-1 (T1) FS mathematics (α- cuts play a central role); 4) reviews Mamdani and TSK interval type-2 (IT2) FLSs so that their mathematical operations can be easily used in a GT2 FLS; 5) provides all of the formulas that describe both Mamdani and TSK GT2 FLSs; 6) explains why center-of sets type-reduction should be favored for a GT2 FLS over centroid type-reduction; 7) provides three simplified GT2 FLSs (two are for Mamdani GT2 FLSs and one is for a TSK GT2 FLS), all of which bypass type reduction and are generalizations from their IT2 FLS counterparts to GT2 FLSs; 8) explains why gradient-based optimization should not be used to optimally design a GT2 FLS; 9) explains how derivative-free optimization algorithms can be used to optimally design a GT2 FLS; and 10) provides a three-step approach for optimally designing FLSs in a progressive manner, from T1 to IT2 to GT2, e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tfuzz.2013.2286414

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional fuzzy logic systems rely on manually designed rule bases, where the number of rules grows exponentially with input dimensions, leading to significant computational burdens.

    “Traditional fuzzy logic systems rely on manually designed rule bases, where the number of rules grows exponentially with the input dimensions, leading to significant computational burdens21.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendel, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Mendel, Jerry M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Published
2014-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
1162-1182
ISSN
  • 1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0034
OpenAlex
W2031176346
Cited by
311
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 4
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Mathematical Control Systems and Analysis
Keywords
general type-2 fuzzy sets, type reduction, interval type-2 fuzzy systems, alpha-cuts, derivative-free optimization, quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization, fuzzy system design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review