The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries
Abstract
At the core of most hyperspectral processing algorithms are distance metrics that compare two spectra and return a scalar value based on some notion of similarity. The two most common distance metrics in hyperspectral processing are the spectral angle mapper (SAM) and the Euclidean minimum distance (EMD), and each metric possesses distinct mathematical and physical properties. In this paper, we enumerate the characteristics of both metrics, and, based on an exact decomposition of SAM, we derive a technique called band add-on (BAO) that iteratively selects bands to increase the angular separation between two spectra. Unlike other feature selection algorithms, BAO exploits a mathematical decomposition of SAM to incrementally add bands. We extend BAO to the more practical problem of increasing the angular separability between two classes of spectra. This scenario parallels the material identification problem where quite often only a small number (<10) of ground-truth measurements are collected for each material class, and statistical classification methods are inapplicable. Two algorithms for selecting bands and class templates are presented to increase the angular separation between two classes. The techniques are compared with several other metric-based approaches in binary discrimination tests with real data. The results demonstrate that band selection can improve the discrimination of very similar targets, while using only a fraction of the available spectral bands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition
(1990) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-27872-x · Cited by 11,031
FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm
Bezdek, J. C., Ehrlich, R., & Full, W. (1984) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/0098-3004(84)90020-7 · Cited by 6,608
Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection
Coifman, R. R., & Wickerhauser, M. V. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.119732 · Cited by 3,188
Floating search methods in feature selection
Pudil, P., Novovičová, J., & Kittler, J. (1994) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9 · Cited by 3,098
Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance
Jain, A., & Zongker, D. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.574797 · Cited by 2,171
Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion
Tarantola, A., & Valette, B. (1982) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg020i002p00219 · Cited by 2,036
The Divergence and Bhattacharyya Distance Measures in Signal Selection
Kailath, T. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1967.1089532 · Cited by 1,856
A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector
Robey, F. C., Fuhrmann, D. R., Kelly, E. J., & Nitzberg, R. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/7.135446 · Cited by 1,660
Cited by
Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review
Paoletti, M. E., Haut, J. M., Plaza, J., & Plaza, A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.09.006 · Cited by 1,073
Feature Mining for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Jia, X., Kuo, B.-C., & Crawford, M. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2012.2229082 · Cited by 383
Detection Algorithms in Hyperspectral Imaging Systems: An Overview of Practical Algorithms
Manolakis, D., Truslow, E., Pieper, M., Cooley, T., & Brueggeman, M. (2014) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2013.2278915 · Cited by 279
Nature-inspired framework for hyperspectral band selection
Nakamura, R. Y. M., Fonseca, L. M. G., Santos, J. A. D., Torres, R. D. S., Yang, X.-S., & Papa, J. P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2013.2258351 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Keshava, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1552-1565
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143277109
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 34.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2004.830549
- The paper
- Keshava, N. (2004). Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2004.830549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.