The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance
Abstract
The 16-day revisit cycle of Landsat has long limited its use for studying global biophysical processes, which evolve rapidly during the growing season. In cloudy areas of the Earth, the problem is compounded, and researchers are fortunate to get two to three clear images per year. At the same time, the coarse resolution of sensors such as the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) limits the sensors' ability to quantify biophysical processes in heterogeneous landscapes. In this paper, the authors present a new spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM) algorithm to blend Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance. Using this approach, high-frequency temporal information from MODIS and high-resolution spatial information from Landsat can be blended for applications that require high resolution in both time and space. The MODIS daily 500-m surface reflectance and the 16-day repeat cycle Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) 30-m surface reflectance are used to produce a synthetic "daily" surface reflectance product at ETM+ spatial resolution. The authors present results both with simulated (model) data and actual Landsat/MODIS acquisitions. In general, the STARFM accurately predicts surface reflectance at an effective resolution close to that of the ETM+. However, the performance depends on the characteristic patch size of the landscape and degrades somewhat when used on extremely heterogeneous fine-grained landscapes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges
Piao, S., Liu, Q., Chen, A., Janssens, I. A., Fu, Y., Dai, J., Liu, L., Lian, X., Shen, M., & Zhu, X. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14619 · Cited by 2,120
Optical vegetation indices for monitoring terrestrial ecosystems globally
Zeng, Y., Hao, D., Huete, A., Dechant, B., Berry, J., Chen, J. M., Joiner, J., Frankenberg, C., Bond-Lamberty, B., Ryu, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00298-5 · Cited by 837
Sexton, J. O., Song, X.-P., Feng, M., Noojipady, P., Anand, A., Huang, C., Kim, D.-H., Collins, K. M., Channan, S., DiMiceli, C., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2013.786146 · Cited by 829
Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources
Anderson, M. C., Allen, R. G., Morse, A., & Kustas, W. P. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.025 · Cited by 734
Generating daily land surface temperature at Landsat resolution by fusing Landsat and MODIS data
Weng, Q., Fu, P., & Gao, F. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.003 · Cited by 567
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, F., Masek, J., Schwaller, M., & Hall, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2207-2218
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088603520
- Cited by
- 1,968
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2006.872081
- The paper
- Gao, F., Masek, J., Schwaller, M., & Hall, F. (2006). On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2006.872081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.